I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings with my comments. Yes, Rugby is relatively easy to pick-up and relatively easy to master. I played rugby for two leagues in Boston and for a league in DC, total experience was probably 8 or 9 years. I picked it up after graduating from college, where I played football at the I-A level for 5 years and lacrosse at the club level for 2 of those years.
I believe that this perception may be supported by the author's comment: While it can take years to learn many of the nuances of rugby, it is not unheard of for a new player to step in and make an immediate contribution.
All of the sports mentioned above are team oriented, my objection was to the comment that football and lacrosse are primarily focused on a few star players, that just isn't the case. You can rely on the actions and athleticism of one or two key players in rugby far more than you can in lacrosse or football.
So, have you played all of these sports at a competitive level or are you just being a difficult rugby player who feels that this is the hardest hitting and most competitive sport in the world? I know a couple of ultimate frisbee players who may disagree with your limited point of view.
Report this