A Bend Will Become A Corner

The intersection where North Street, Linwood Avenue and Franklin Street come together is scheduled to undergo $250,000 worth of capital improvements. According to The Allentown Neighbor, the reconstruction of the intersection will help to alleviate traffic concerns, while softening the overall appearance. As it is now, there are sections of Franklin that will be narrowed as the street approaches North. The overrun stretches of asphalt will be trimmed down to allow for additional green-spaces. This will change the dynamic of the junction from a thoroughfare to a more pedestrian-friendly right-of-way.
The area is home to residential apartments, a gallery, Ascension Episcopal Church and Tapestry Charter School. Since there is not a traffic-calming roundabout, measures are being taken to add to the quality of life for those that live, work and play (Tony Sisti Park) in the area. The current bend that leads from Franklin into Linwood would be replaced with an actual corner where cars will be directed to take a right, and then a left in order to proceed. An additional traffic light would be added to ensure that drivers respect the new road design. The Linwood Preservation District and Friends is the group that is spearheading the project.

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view … 




Comment Options
Aloha
I love this idea! I know that I have found myself driving through here right after work, and keeping up with the flow of traffic does make it feel like a speedway. I also like the suggestion that narrowing the street, and reclaiming some of that asphalt-covered area around the bend, will make this area much more park like. Come to think of it, there is already a little park there on the bend, and I'm all for making that park a little bigger. I can't wait to see this happen. Did I miss in the article when it was scheduled for? I hate to be a skeptic, but you know how cheap talk can be...especially in this town.
Report this
MisterChips
Hey Queenseyes, what kind of apartments are there other than residential?
Just kidding.
Full speed ahead, so to speak, on traffic calming at this intersection. It can be scary for cyclists and pedestrians. It seems ideal for a roundabout, so I am surprised that this solution was not adopted. Next up: return Linwood to two way. As a one-way, it is an unpatrolled speedway and has a needlessly lifeless feel as a result.
Report this
RPreskop
I am willing to give this improvement project a chance and see how it turns out, why not reduce the amount of land consumed by asphalt pavement. Please do not place cyclists in the same catagory with pedestrians because many cyclists are among the worst traffic law violators. It is time to stop just blaming motorists for all the problems and start placing some of the blame where it rightfully belongs, on the cyclists. Cyclists are just as much a serious safety hazard to pedestrians as motorists because they think they are above and exempt from traffic laws which is definately not true. Numerous times, I have seen cyclists running red traffic lights and ignoring stop signs, riding against traffic, cutting in front of traffic, cutting right in front of pedestrians in crosswalks, and the most common unlawful activity- riding on the sidewalks. The unlawful riding of bikes on sidewalks is especially serious along Elmwood Avenue and many of these cyclists have no regard for pedestrians because they think they are above the law. This is why several motorists despise cyclists and a growing number of pedestrians complain about cyclists as well. It is time for government authorities to start cracking down hard on cyclists and force them to follow all traffic laws and keep them off the sidewalks. This will help improve public safety and overall quality of life in the city.
Report this
MisterChips
Thank you, RPreskop. Maybe it will get through to DRIVERS that I am legally obligated to be in the road and that they should stop hurling profanity at me and telling me to get on the sidewalk. If cyclists get hassled or physically threatened by drivers often enough, most of them will retreat to the sidewalk or give up cycling altogether.
As a cyclist myself, I am all for ticketing those who ride on the wrong side of the road, weave in and out of lanes, and so on. Those people make my commute hazardous, too.
Here's a clue for drivers: cyclists who wear helmets tend to be responsible and predictable on the road. Bare-headed cyclists seem not to give a sh_t and will ride on the wrong side, weave in and out of lanes, etc.
Report this
Denizen
Yeah, "residential apartments" is redundantly redundant.
Report this
Charger
I share Mr. C's experience of being yelled/honked at for rising in the street, and being told to ride on the sidewalks, but I hadn't noticed the distinction he makes between helmeted and bareheaded riders. I can think of several riders with helmets I regularly see on the sidewalk, and visa versa. Education and enforcements are certainly needed for all.
Report this
iAMbuffalo
Healmets or not, cyclists need to obey the rules of the road. While driving along South Elmwood on Friday night about 30+ cyclists decided to U-Turn by Allen Street and caused a great deal of congestion. If you want to live by the sword, you had better be willing to die by the sword. Please obey the rules of the road and everyone will be a lot happier.
Report this
JBooth
I agree with a lot that has been said in both directions of this argument about cyclists.
First and foremost though, many drivers are just as bad driving their cars as some bicyclists are riding a bicycle, there is one distinction, cyclists cannot kill someone - drivers can. In New York State 27% of all injuries and fatalities are bicyclists and pedestrians. Education and enforcement of the traffiic laws is important and shjould be taught to all users. Regardless of that fact that some cyclists do not follow all the rules of the road - the onus needs to be on the driver because of his/her ability to kill someone. Education, enforcement are two major componenets but engineering is also an important factor. As this article was orginally intended, having an environment designed to encourgae drivers to follow the speed limit and provide cyclists and pedestrians with the proper amenities for safe travel as well is how we can develop complete streets in our city. Currently we have a system of incomplete streets not designed to be used safely by all users.
The City of Buffalo has a Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Board that has been established to develop cooperative solutions in the city to enhance safe travel for bicyclists, pedestrians and persons with disabilities. There are currently two vacancies on the Board. If you are interested in becoming a member and participating to develop solutions; or would like to simply attend meetings to learn more please visit: http://www.city-buffalo.com/Home/Leadership/BicyclePedestrianAdvisoryBoard
Report this
Colin
IAB --
I'm guessing what you saw was Critical Mass (or something like it), where cyclists mob up and ride as a sort of direct action statement in favor of cyclist's rights. "We're not blocking traffic -- we ARE traffic."
Report this
RPreskop
JBooth, You are wrong when you say the onus needs to be on the motorist because lawbreaking by cyclists has caused a lot of pedestrian injuries. Granted a car can kill a pedestrian but a bicycle hitting a pedestrian can cause serious injury and depending on the age of the pedestrian, it could result in permanent disability. So the onus for highway safety should also be put on the cyclist as well as the motorist because there are too many cyclists out there that think they are above the law and have all the right of way in the world. The distinction between careless motorists and careless cyclists is irrelevant. Both are a serious safety hazard to pedestrians and persons with disabilities. I am sick and damned tired of our political leaders coddling and ignoring unlawful and dangerous acts by careless cyclists on our streets. I ride my bike frequently and follow all the traffic laws and I have not had any problems with motorists. My problems while on a bike are from other cyclists who refuse to follow the laws, that is why so many of them have been getting injured or killed, its their own spite and stupidity thats at fault, not just the motorists. Another thing, this idiotic idea of narrowing major streets is a major part of the problem of bicyclist vs motorist. Instead of narrowing these streets, they should be permanently kept at their present width but change the pavement markings instead. Install bike lanes on both sides of the street and reconfigure traffic lanes and permanently eliminate all right turn only lanes, these are not expressways they are city streets. That alone will help provide a complete network of safe cycling routes throughout the city and even into the suburbs as well. But all cyclists must be made fully accountable for all their actions by the law while they are on the road period.
Report this