Buffalo Should Take Charge

With everyone talking about the auto bailout and the future roll to be played by car manufacturers, many people are beginning to look at local government's roll in the deal. Car manufacturers are looking for partners within city government that will make the transition to alternative energy easier. Some cities are answering the call by studying infrastructure in order to come up with plans that would allow residents the ability to make the transition a smooth one. There are still big fears when it comes to the prices and maintenance of owning an electric car. And what are the electric companies doing to ensure that the power is there when cities do lead the charge? From Tony Posawatz, vehicle line director of the Chevy Volt, in a recent CNET News article:
"We are looking at communities that exist that are willing to put all the pieces together," Posawatz said at the Electric Drive Transportation Association's Conference & Exposition earlier this month. "To me, the Volt is a remarkable product. But, if the other stuff--the communities, etc.--isn't there, then we run the risk of failing."
How does a community like Buffalo get out of the alternative transportation starting gate if no one is dedicating resources to answering these questions? It might behoove the Buffalo auto dealers to form some sort of a coalition to research the appropriate tactics needed to work with the electric company, The City and the citizens. In the end, it's going to be the car dealers who will be looking to capitalize on the sales, so why wouldn't the push start there? The CNET article gives a few different collaborative scenarios, including this one:
Nissan is considering a battery swapping program, something that start-up Better Place plans to set up in a number of countries, Hawaii, and the San Francisco Bay Area. The idea is to avoid the problem of a car's limited battery range by having a network of spots--they would resemble car washes--where drivers can swap fresh batteries in for depleted ones.
Once again, are we going to rely on the rest of the country to come up with the solutions, or are we going to utilize our own resources and talents to get these programs off the ground? If the cost is too high and the hassle is too much, then we can pretty much write off the surge in electric auto sales for years. It's going to take years just to get the electric car infrastructure in place. But don't we want to be in the forefront of this new wave as it is developing? Should The City be looking at ways to bolster Buffalo job growth by studying the issue more extensively? Who would be responsible for all of the different roles? Is Buffalo ready to implement a 'Geek Squad'? Continuing from the article:
"Building a "geek squad" to install 240-volt charging boxes at people's homes is one example of the services that will smooth thehttp://mt.buffalorising.com/mt.cgi?__mode=view&_type=entry&id=23080&blog_id=21&saved_added=1 way for electric cars, said GM's Posawatz. "There are a lot of opportunities and possibilities for different people in the value chain," he said."
Is there potential to finally utilize some of our vacant parking lots? Why not turn over some of the underused City-owned urban lots to progressive dealerships? Those lots could be used to showcase the cutting edge electric cars while offering drivers a place to charge up and/or exchange batteries. If the incentives are in place for people to move in a different direction, the transition will eventually take place. We're at a crucial intersection when it comes to relying so heavily on gas... what is in store for Buffalo when it comes to capitalizing on these efforts? Finally, from CNET:
The financial industry bailout bill (separate from the auto industry aid package that failed to pass Congress) helps clear the cost hurdle for plug-in electric cars. Depending on the size of the battery, consumers and businesses can get up to a $7,500 tax credit starting next year.
As the incentives start to roll in, we have to ask ourselves a question. "Do we take our turn, or do we wait for our turn?"
Thanks to Swannie Jim for the lead. Photo: Green Car Site

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view … 




Comment Options
al-alo
are electric cars really that green? obviously the power must be generated somewhere - much of it with coal.
but even if you assume that it is clean electricity (with the Niagara Power project and potential for wind and water generation, it isnt too great a leap), those big ol' batteries need to be manufactured and disposed of somewhere. both of those processes arent exactly clean or energy efficient.
is it possible that a hyper-efficient gasoline auto could be more environmentally friendly than electric cars (at least this generation)? i dont know, but it seems that it could be competitive.
for that matter, is CNG, clean diesel or LPG a better alternative? i dont know, im far from an engineer or environmental scientist. but should we be picking winners and losers for the marketplace at this point? id hate to dedicate resources to a technology that might not prove to be the best answer to transportation needs.
___
and of course, there are proven green infrastructure improvements that can be made now, with long lasting and relatively expensive off the shelf equipment - public transit!
Report this
sonyactivision
Electric cars don't know the difference between coal, nuclear or hydro. They just know that whatever pollution they cause is somebody else's problem.
Report this
BuffaloBloviator
Electric cars will be embraced by consumers when the cost of electricity is substantially less the gasoline. Until the government signals that they are willing to reduce government obstacles to electricity production, the public will not be confident in electric cars.
Electricity is more dependent on domestic energy supplies than the more importable fuels such as oil and liquefied natural gas. I don't think that electric cars are going to be taken seriously by consumers until they see that we are creating an abundance of electricity from nuclear and coal fueled power plants.
Technology wise, I don't doubt that electric/electronic cars can eventually surpass gasoline cars in size, comfort, safety, and performance.
Report this
sbrof
Good discussion about the topic. Electric cars are better for the environment because most modern batteries are made from recyclable materials.So they can go back, be reprocessed and put back into cars. So their manufacture isn't any worse than a typical car now. It is true that a bunch of electric cars that get their energy from a coal plant isn't better than current gas. Except that the level of pollution per mile is significantly reduced. Also the ability to have some level of control over the single point pollution vs millions of individually and hard to regulate personal engines is a huge benefit down the road. But I do agree that electric vehicles need to come with a larger emphasis on clean energy production. Gas cars even really efficient ones with current coal power is bad on top of bad... I hope that our future holds a national agenda and support for green energy.
Now that is all just about the power of the car. There is a HUGE environmental impact from all cars no matter how they are driven. The lifestyle that the car has created in America uses an exhoritant amount of land compared to our population. That with a shift away from extended family households means that there is a land use issue associated with cars.
We only have so much land in the US, and on the Earth and we already live in a lifestyle that requires much more land than we have to counteract our current pollution levels. Continued reliance on Cars, without a national open space agenda to control the amount of sprawl and particularly the wasting of biologically productive lands for housing when there are other lands more appropriate for new developments.
Think about WNY, we have many tens of thousands of fewer people but than in 1970... but yet we take up almost 100% more land than we did in 1970. More infrastructure, fewer people.. Much of our lands in East Aurora, Clarence, Wheatfield are wonderfully fertile lands. These should be supported as such so we can continue to grow our nations food supplies.
Once land is built upon.. it loses a huge amount of its fertility and productive value. With an expected 138-150 million more people in the US by 2050 we need space to grow food. Or unlike our goods, we will become reliant on imports from other countries.
Report this
EVtransPortal
Buffalo can build the infrastructure you need to support electric vehicles. Here's a free resource http://EVtransPortal.com/cerip.html An example of a company you can find there is Evoasis. They are offering to install charging points free of charge through the end of 2008, you'll need to hurry to take them up on that offer.
Report this