Get The Lead Out

Alarm bells across the state began ringing yesterday over indications that Governor Patterson may veto the most comprehensive lead poisoning prevention legislation in state history. I got the news yesterday morning from my friend Ralph Spezio. “We’re in a crisis situation,” said Ralph—surprising words coming from this level-headed retired school principal with a decades-long history of effective community action. At first, I thought he was talking about the Wall Street meltdown, but what he told me really made my blood run cold. I was shocked, yet sure enough, there it was in my morning newspaper.
My mind was boggled at this, as this legislation — a long overdue protection for the children and future of New York—had finally advanced through the state legislature this year after a monumental seven-year effort on the part of advocates across the state, such as the Coalition to Prevent Lead Poisoning. In fact, as Ralph told me yesterday, during those seven years, advocates from across the state have been keeping up the pressure by visiting Albany monthly. Monthly? “Monthly,” said Ralph.
Why are advocates like Ralph so deeply committed to this issue? They have seen firsthand the debilitating results of lead poisoning on urban neighborhoods, such as the one where Ralph himself was born and raised, and later became principal of the neighborhood elementary school. As a boy, he remembers climbing over the back fence and watching construction of the interstate highway which sliced through the neighborhood, helping spawn a downward cycle of disinvestment and blight shared by many other urban neighborhoods across New York in the postwar period. So after returning to become principal of the neighborhood elementary school, Ralph saw perhaps more clearly than anyone the effects of the downward spiral of disinvestment and blight.
He especially took note of the behavioral issues displayed by many of the students, and noted the parallel with the dilapidated condition of much of the neighborhood housing. When the county health department discovered that 40% of children tested showed toxic levels of lead, he knew he had to act. Ralph is now one of the most knowledgeable in the state on the effects of lead poisoning, calling it “The Invisible Monster.”
As the Buffalo News editorial page stated : Evidence that early lead poisoning causes brain damage is overwhelming. That damage can affect everything from decision-making to impulse control. A recent study in the Cincinnati area showed that children who have been exposed to lead paint are much more likely to be arrested once they hit age 18. The more lead exposure during childhood, the greater the likelihood of arrest, sometimes for crimes of violence.
The costs to society are staggering and tragic.
Yet the efforts of Ralph and others showed definitely that it is possible for all homes to be made lead-safe for kids. This work was the basis for model legislation in Rochester mandating lead-safe work practices and lead testing in at-risk neighborhoods. But there was the question of funding: lead problems appear predominantly in neighborhoods where the houses are improperly maintained—often blighted areas unlikely to economically support the work necessary (often by landlords) to make homes lead safe. One key to the solution would be to get tax credits passed at the state level, so they went to work. Advocates and legislators from the Rochester area and western New York have been in the vanguard. And at long last, after seven years of grueling effort, the bill is now on Governor Patterson’s desk.
This legislation will have, at most, a modest impact on the state budget—estimated at less than $15 Million. Yet the long-term impact this will have on our children and our future is immeasurable and invaluable. When it comes to preventing lead damage, it is simply impossible to overestimate the benefits to all of us.
Finally, The Invisible Monster must be slain. This legislation will strike a mortal blow. The time is right. This must be done. Governor Patterson, it’s not about the budget, it’s about the children. For the children of today and tomorrow, take up your pen—mightier than the sword—and strike the blow by signing this legislation.
More information:
The “Childhood Lead Poisoning Primary Prevention and Safe Housing Act” (Assembly A.6399, Senate S.6350)
Buffalo News editorial
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle article
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle news
Syracuse Post-Standard editorial
Albany Times-Union editorial
What can you do?
Contact Governor Patterson and ask him to sign the “Childhood Lead Poisoning Primary Prevention and Safe Housing Act” (Assembly A.6399, Senate S.6350):
Sample letter by the Coalition to Prevent Lead Poisioning
Governor David Paterson
c/o Lisa Ullman, Assistant Counsel to the Governor
Executive Chamber, Second Floor
New York State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
Email: Legislative.Secretary@chamber.state.ny.us
Fax: (518) 474-8099
Photo credits:Buffalo ReUse (bottom)

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view … 




Comment Options
whynot
I am confused by this article. The lead poisoning is related to urban blight because of disinvestment brought on the by the creation of the highway that sliced through the neighborhood? Do I have that correct?
Report this
RaChaCha
whynot, looks like the second half of the article didn't get posted - I've asked BR to put it up - stay tuned!
Report this
allfit
It is my understanding that lead paint has not been used in residential buildings since the sixties and seventies, and it was banned completely in NYS in 1978. One of the arguments that opponents of this bill used was that most houses should have been painted with latex paint that would seal in the lead contamination sometime during the 30 years since the paint was outlawed.
It is also my understanding that the bill is in jeopardy because of the unlimited and unchecked tax credits for owners and landlords who only have to apply for the credit to get it. There are no checks or audits in the process, and no way to prove that remediation has taken place. Several legislators felt that the lead content may already be contained in the house paint, and that lead may be coming from different sources. The feeling is that this issue is not limited to a landlord's ability to paint the interior of their rental properties, and would essentially cost taxpayers money to upkeep a private, for profit, venture.
This is a very opinionated and one sided piece of journalism. The editorials that you cite are just that, editorials. They are citing one side of the argument in terms that are meant to incite fear and a reactionary response. Let's think about this before we decide to spend a modest $15 Million dollars on this initiative, and a couple Million dollars on the next, and the next, and the next.
Report this
blackrocklifer
allfit- I will not comment on the politics involved here but as a I have 30 years in the field of building maintenance and engineering I do know quite a bit about lead paint. Latex paint does not effectively "seal in the lead contamination" and in fact multiple layers of paint usally make the situation worse. Area of concern are windows, (especially the tracks and sills) doors, (scraping on the jam) kitchens and baths, ( due to moisture) exterior perimeters (due to peeling) and contaminated soil. When surfaces are covered in many layers of paint as in many old homes adhesion is poor and flaking results. There are products available to encapsulate lead paint but proper preparation is necessary to ensure good results. That said it is my opinion that good housekeeping is a big factor in protecting children from this very REAL danger
Report this
allfit
BRL - I was commented more on the politics of the decision, not on the damages caused by lead paint. I have been following this for about a year and have found the debate in Albany interesting. I was hoping to see some of the arguments that are being made against the bill in this article to balance it out.
Report this
blackrocklifer
allfit- I was pointing out the uninformed opinion "One of the arguments opponents of this bill used was is that most of the houses should have been painted with latex paint that would seal in the lead paint" This statement shows the ignorance that sometimes passes for political debate. Obviously those who support this view have no expertise in this area and seem to be playing politics with a issue that continues to plague our communities.
Report this