Tie a Yellow Ribbon….

Tie a Yellow Ribbon….

Story Options

Sharp-eyed residents and commuters noticed the yellow ribbons of caution fluttering around the Summit Building at 918 Main Street this week. Apparently the building’s upper floors are making their way into the basement. Miraculously, the façade remains standing, but for how long? Will inspectors push the owner to make emergency repairs to the Allentown Historic Preservation District structure? Unlikely since the building is City-owned.

I have been posting on the plight of this building since December 2005. One of thousands of vacant and crumbling City-owned properties, this one seemingly has plenty of re-use potential due to its size, character, and most importantly, location.

The four-story, Richardsonian Romanesque brick building is located next to the Red Jacket Apartments, south of Allen Street and on the edge of the budding Medical Campus. It was a former carriage factory built in the 1880's and designed by Cyrus K. Porter, a well-known Buffalo architect. Neighbors say the roof collapsed over two years ago and additional floors have caved in this week.

920-2.jpg

A few years ago developer Chris Jacobs expressed interest in the property but later backed away. Robert Wulbrecht purchased neighboring 916 Main in 2005 and later signed a purchase agreement with the City for 918 Main. Wulbrecht's planned retail and residential conversion project hit a roadblock when egress couldn't be obtained for an emergency exit opening onto a parking lot owned by 20 Allen St. LLC, owners of Cathode Ray bar. 916 Main Street is for sale after Robert Wulbrecht's death last year, though is said to be under contract.

A well known developer with an end-user in tow presented a proposal to the City to take on 918 Main about a month ago. It was considered a non-starter by Buffalo officials due to a hefty $2 million subsidy request. The developer is expected to discuss his ideas with the neighborhood in the near future.

Meanwhile, the Allentown Association, still smarting from the loss of 399 Franklin, has been huddling with City Hall in recent months to come up with a solution. One option being explored is the feasibility of preserving the façade and tearing down the balance. After this week's additional damage, neighbors are scrambling to arrange a meeting with City officials. Better hurry.

Get Connected: Richard Tobe, Dept. of Economic Development, Permit and Inspection Services; Timothy E. Wanamaker, Director of Strategic Planning

920-3.jpg

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. STEEL

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 00:17

    These floors only collapsed because no one maintained the roof. A simple investment in the roof every 25 years or so and this does not happen. Tragic and stupid!

  2. VictrolaMan

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 01:31

    Since seeing the BIG hole in the roof on satellite images (http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/3555/holegk6.jpg) , I've wondered if anything was happening with this building. Now, I know. Sad.

  3. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 12:48

    simple solution... eminent domain to take a strip of the parking lot for a second means of egress. The owner of the parking lot and corner bar can deal with it. They have a smelly bar and an ugly parking lot and it is a shame their their greed would allow two buildings to crumble in their own backyard. Talk about inconsiderate.

    Also, aren't these actually two buildings, with a shared common wall? Does the city own both or just one of them?

  4. chris69

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 13:56

    Simple answer. The city was negligent so the city can secure the facade until a developer chooses to rebuild the rear of the buildings.

    Now that the rear of the building is gone....who knows perhaps there can now be underground parking at the site.

    I say this....yes buildings are integral to the period of the allentown historical district....which if correct already allowed the demolition of a precivil war building for a print ship expansion...sadly....but in this case we can save the facade.

  5. 42nate

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 15:04

    Does the 2nd means of egress have to be at the back? Why can't it be at the front?

    I think the Allentown Association opposed the print shop demolition but the Preservation Board approved it anyway. You can blame that one on City Hall, which could have assigned its economic development people to help relocate the print shop.

  6. RaChaCha

    3 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 15:40

    A month ago I had the cool privilege of being invited to lead a tour of downtown development projects for Buffalo Old Home Week. Along the way, we happened upon the Well Known Developer referred to in this posting, and he generously showed off one of his projects to my tour group. At another event that evening, that developer told me about the Summit Building, and his efforts to work with the City. The next day, when I had a moment, I popped up to the Allentown station on MetroRail and took a close look at this building and its surroundings.

    This property has everything going for it: it’s part of a block with outstanding, cohesive architecture. It’s across the street from Metro Rail, and next door to the striking Red Jacket, at a major gateway to Allentown. It’s surrounded by those achingly beautiful, vibrant streetscapes which make people smitten with Allentown. And it’s right next door to a vanishing breed: a fully-stocked urban arts supply store -- in Rochester we have but one left, and nowhere near this good.

    I also noticed that it’s located further up the same Main Street block as the Granite Works, another situation where City-owned, neglected buildings came to the brink of demolition, despite their architectural significance, economic value, and reuse potential. The situation with the Summit Building makes one wonder if any lasting lessons were learned at City Hall from Granite Works. Having had local government experience, my fear is that development officials at City Hall may still be so shellshocked over the Webb Building experience earlier this year that they’re paralyzed with fear of a storm of criticism should they give this project to a Well Known Developer.

    Well, perhaps the yellow ribbons going up can shake the City out of that shellshock with the realization that there’s a worse fate than being accused of cronyism: the embarrassment of having a City-owned building collapsing from neglect -- despite having a viable reuse proposal on the table -- right next door to the offices of the neighborhood association which represents residents of one of the largest preservation districts in the nation. And that perhaps points the way forward: as the posting points out, the neighborhood association and preservation groups are stepping up their mobilization on this situation. If the City is wise, it can use their collective support for a viable project to shield it from possible charges of cronyism. What matters now is that a viable proposal is on the table which would be a win for everyone. The developer has produced a committed end-user, and has both the know-how and intestinal fortitude to take on a building in a state of internal collapse. The City should -- learning from past mistakes, not being paralyzed by them -- act immediately to get the Summit Building in the hands of such a developer.

  7. rickyrick

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 17:32

    In this city, yellow tape and a roof falling on a city owned building means....PARKING LOT Coming Soon!!! Soon we can see it happening to the former AM&A's on Main Street and so on. We see it all the time, don't be blind folks, look around your own city and smell the asfault.

  8. NBJOHN

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 12th 2007, 18:56

    too bad about this building - hopefully an obit. wont be posted soon.

  9. kelly

    3 ratings12345
    Aug 13th 2007, 02:42

    As disgusted as I am to see these buildings collapse, I honestly can't find myself shocked that developers haven't jumped for them yet. The Granite Works are lovely, yes. And the storefronts remain empty long after the project was completed. It doesn't help convince someone to invest when they see new projects, ones that were so heavily publicized, unable to fill their space for months at a stretch. I wish they'd gone with a lovely ground-floor common space for the apartments (which, IIRC, are all rented), maybe a nice workout center or something, just so such a prominent development on Main Street wouldn't be sporting fading "for rent" signs, discouraging anyone else thinking of stepping up.

    I don't know what can be done. I'm not an urban planner, and I can't even think of a realistic suggestion, other than maybe high end apartments, as long as they don't also go for mixed-use. I just hate the thought of walking by such an ugly gap in the fabric of Allentown every day as I get on and off the metrorail.

  10. chris69

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 13th 2007, 12:17

    I think that the potential is there for the facade to be saved and the rear of the building rebuilt.

    Everyone knows that the Trico Building Complex across the street is going to be sold and redeveloped as part of the Center of Excellence for Life Sciences. There is absolutely no reason why the facades of these buildings cannot be saved and a very nice office/apartment building built behind it. Infact, building a new building with the old facade would probably be cheaper, better and have more amenities. I can only imagine how prohibitively expensive it would have been to rewire, replumb, reroof that building not to mention retrofitting things like elevators, handicap access, safety requirements etc.

    It just depends if the community rallies to save the facade....and if the city can work with a developer to do the right thing....the area is increasing in value...and it can certainly be cost justified.

  11. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 13th 2007, 15:53

    I cant believe I am saying this but I agree with Chris.

    I think instead of giving homeowners money to fix up their homes in select districts, that money should be given to companies to fix the urban core. After all, with a healthy urban core, residential revitalization will take care of itself.

  12. Kip

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 13th 2007, 16:53

    Man I was just at Buffalo General for the past few days and thought to my self how cool that building could be if redeveloped... I did not think it was so bad but is an awesome loaction. Some thing needs to be done with hopefully positive and keeping the look and feel

  13. Sal

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 13th 2007, 23:12

    I toured the privately-owned 916 Main and saw the interior of the city-owned 918 Main about 3 years ago. The roof had partially collapsed back then at 918 Main and the interior was a mess. The city should auction off ALL city-owned property on a regular basis. Try buying the city-owned empty lot at 00 Nottingham if you want to see government waste at its best.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links