She’s Back- 591 Delaware Resurrected

Next time you see Matt or Chris Moscati, make sure you say ‘thank you.’ Heck, even a hug would not be out of line. The brothers have rescued 591 Delaware Avenue from the wrecking ball, proving once again that almost any building can be saved. The historic Allentown structure was extremely close to being demolished just a few years ago and has been painstakingly rebuilt at considerable expense.
The original owner of 591 Delaware (1899) was Clarence L. Bryant, one of the founders of Bryant & Stratton Business College. A devastating four-alarm fire ravaged the structure in February 1996 while under the ownership of Dr. Charles Battista. Due to the fire's extensive initial damage and subsequent deterioration caused by natural elements, the building's roof and a majority of the interior structural elements no longer existed or were left unsound.
Matt and Chris Moscati of TRM Architecture, Design and Planning, P.C. acquired the property in December of 2001 at a City of Buffalo auction. As seen in the ‘before’ and early construction photos (slideshow), it took extraordinary vision and a love for the city to take this project on. Their goal was to not only rebuild a fire-scarred prominent property on Delaware Avenue, but also to reconstruct the 11,000 sq.ft. landmark designed by Esenwein & Johnson and bridge over a hundred years of design innovation.
Says Matt, “I am hopeful that the project can serve as positive example of adaptive reuse of a historic property that can maintain their original character while integrating modern environmentally sensitive systems and materials.”
The building now provides high-end professional office space integrating the latest sustainable building technologies (LEED certified) within the historical context of the original structure. There is also a two-story residential unit on the upper floors, a modern living space further promoting the benefits of mixed-use concepts within the downtown core.
O’Keefe Shaw & Co., Inc., a full-service investment firm, has moved into the building’s 6,000 sq.ft. of office space. The eleven year old firm relocated from North Forest Road in Amherst.
Thanks to Matt and Chris, 591 Delaware remains an invaluable part of Buffalo’s historical and cultural heritage, as well as economic future.
Founded in 1977 and located at 448 Delaware Avenue, TRM Architecture, Design and Planning, P.C., is a Western New York-based, 20+ employee, architectural firm with strong local ties and a broad spectrum of diversified clients.
Get connected, TRM: 716.883.3516; O’Keefe Shaw & Co: 716.362.9899

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view …
Caroline Kennedy was in town for a visit with our mayor yesterday. A possible choice to succeed US Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kennedy's name has been mentioned along with that of Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo) and our own Byron Brown, among others.
Certainly, Kennedy has "been around politics" all of her life, which is to say she was born into a family of politicos and lived in the White House--neither of which would necessarily f …
Free light rail rides on downtown's above ground section could be derailed thanks to the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority's budget mess. That is the news coming out of a Buffalo Place meeting this morning. Facing a budget shortfall and reduced State operating assistance, the NFTA is scrambling for new revenue sources and is contemplating charging for rides along the lengthy downtown pedestrian mall.




Comment Options
STEEL
Fantastic job!
Then again those damn preservationist obstructionists have once again conspired to block the creation of additional parking or another of those coveted shovel ready sites. How are we ever going to attract more companies downtown without more shovel ready sites?
Report this
Hudy2005
When you consider this project, the Webb Building, and the Granite Works buildings, it is clear that very few buildings are beyong being restored/resurrected. All of these examples involved buildings that many considered "too far gone". Ironically, they are also among the best examples of restoring a building to its original character for modern uses. These are quality renovations that bring these buildings very close to their original exterior appearance. It would be great if this trend continues. Genesse block downtown, the old Sattler's Theatre (on Broadway by Jefferson), Transfiguration even.
Report this
Martin
This rebuild amazes me every time I walk past it. I wish they would have an open house to see the finished product, I'd be first in line. Well done fella's!
On a side note, with this project nearly finished, it show that the the city does not have a leg to stand on for 918 Main street [to pull the building down] w/ the collapsed floors. This along w/ the "Granite Works" proves any Historic structure can be saved!
Report this
42nate
Yes indeed, saving a building usually has little to do with technical factors or lack of know-how, though the fire department and city inspectors who advise Housing Court usually lack know-how, and we've lost usable buildings because of their ignorance.
But out on the street, Buffalo has all kinds of expertise for rehabilitating damaged structures and has proven Housing Court wrong. "Too far gone" is a social judgement that really means, "No one wants to live here." Well, as Harvey Garrett and others have proven, that judgement is completely reversible, and rehabilitating existing structures is one of the ways it gets reversed.
Thank you Moscati brothers for sticking with this project over the long haul.
Report this
JohnMartin
While the smug cloud in this thread is pretty thick, there is more to the story. While it is certainly possible to save any building, it is market forces that determine whether or not it can and will be saved.
If the market sees a need for a restored building like this, it will happen. If it is not economically feasible for a developer to do so, it's not going to happen. For instance, the commercial spaces at the Granite Works buildings remain totally empty more than a year after their completion. If I'm a developer, I look at that and wonder as to the economic value of investing significant resources into such a thorough rehabilitation. No matter how well intentioned I may be, if I can't make money on the project, there isn't much point...businesses are not 501c3 organizations.
While we can all sit here and be condescending about how some developers see more value in surface lots and shovel ready sites than in restoring burned out classics, it is the market that shapes the intentions of developers. When the local economy makes it more profitable for a developer to rehab than demolish, this will happen more frequently.
Report this
uptownnc704
Spot on JohnMartin. Everything is a case by case basis. This doesn't mean that every building needs to be saved or more importantly can be saved.
Anyway, i've always loved this building and am glad they could do with something. Unfortunately it had to sit in a very poor unsafe condition for years. Almost making one think the site could have been reused quicker (other then a parking lot) if the old structure was demonished.
I find this with mixed emotion. I'm glad it was saved, but let's not fool ourselves by thinking everything can be saved. This was an extremly costly rehab.
Anyone know if they built it to the same design specifications as the original? I'm guessing not since much has changed since the original build. I'd be really impressed if they put in the some ornate molding inside.
Report this
al-alo
just for clarity's sake, lets not fool ourselves and call this a restoration. it is basically new construction with 3 original exterior walls.
not that i think that it isnt a good idea. for decades now, places like washington dc have been doing complete interior demolition. basically, all that remains are facades of the originals with modern amenities like elevators, fire suppression, hvac, and most importantly -underground parking garages tucked neatly inside.
frankly, not that it is a one size fits all solution, but i think it is a pretty good comprimise for buildings that would be exessively costly to retrofit, but is scale and style fit the area and needs of the community.
Report this
xosder
A heartfelt and well deserved THANK YOU to Architect Moscati.
A great sidebar to this is "Architects turned developer". Bonnie Foit Albert at her building on the 700 block of Main Street when nobody wanted to be there. Jake Schneider did it twice on Delaware at 443 and 599 and now at the Historic Warehouse Lofts at 210 Ellicott....and now the Moscati's at 591. Amazing vision and sticktoitiveness. I would think that after seeing what he was able to accomplish here, other developers would be standing in line to engage Matt in their projects.
Report this
STEEL
Well, if we can't save everything let's be thankful that someone is trying to save something.
Report this
chrish
Parking lot progress halted again! Grrrr...
Report this
Denizen
al-alo is right. This is practically a newbuild (a great one at that) behind a saved facade.
Report this
Martin
yes it is a rebuild, but it goes to show that the facades of old buildings that nned to be saved can be, I'm certainly not saying every building in buffalo should be saved. Growth is growth...
Report this
hodgepodge
unlike johnmartin, my friend, it's tough to have so much faith in "market forces." for example, was it "market forces" which will allow the owners of the new waterfront condo's huge property tax breaks?
Report this
hamp
This is a great project by some great people. It has saved a wonderful piece of the city's history and an important part of the urban fabric. This shows that there is no building that is too far gone to save.
Report this
NBJOHN
enough $$$$$$ can save everything - Too bad Buffalo doesn't have a economy that would allow much more of this.
Report this
Charger
Congratulations. What amazes me is how JohnMartin and uptownnc704 feel compelled to come up with arguments about how this isn't really a win, or can't be used as an argument to save other buildings.
The Granite Works retail is vacant, so JohnMartin, if he were a developer, would think twice about doing such a project? Does the fact that the residential units were all rented within a few weeks of completion count for nothing? Is there no long view in holding out for the right tenant as the BNMC gains speed and the surrounding buildings are rehabbed?
uptownnc703, how can you possibly suggest that if the burned out shell had been torn down that a new building would have been built more quickly? When was the last new commercial building built in Allentown? I honestly don't know. Maybe the Walgreen's? No one in their right mind who wanted to build a new building would have selected that site, if you could even build a new building on it with contemporary codes related to set-backs from lot lines, etc.
Get over it guys. There's no excuse anymore to let these old buildings fall down. If you really want them down, make an argument based on something other than "it's too far gone." Ok?
Report this
STEEL
Of all the many recent renovations in the city the vacancy rate is hovering around 2% (as I understand it). It seems to me that there is a demand for this kind of construction in the city. If 2% vacancy is proof that there is no market for renovated and restored space in Buffalo then we are certainly setting a very high standard.
Report this
Andrew
Great Job! Looks fantastic!
Report this
AtwaterLouse
No of course not. Tax breaks like those and many others are clearly not market forces.
Report this
hodgepodge
exactly my point AL; i was ridiculing the idea that "market forces" alone dictate what is built or to be built.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Hodge - Ok I see your point but don't quite see how it refutes what JohnMartin wrote:
The word "alone" isn't in that. The way I read that, it's saying market forces are an absolutely necessary precondition for what's built or restored - not just what's idealistically wished for by people who have emotional attachments to old buildings. Some projects get tax breaks, some don't -- but in either case (unless a project is totally goverment subsidized) it will ultimately be market forces that determine its viability or lack thereof. That should be obvious, but it's a factor often ignored or minimized when people are in wishful thinking mode. Examples abound around here.
Report this
uptownnc704
Charger -
“uptownnc704 feel compelled to come up with arguments about how this isn't really a win” - In actuality I said I was glad it was saved, just mixed because it took so long.
“or can't be used as an argument to save other buildings.” - Of course it can be used as an argument to save other buildings. I simply said every building needs to be reviewed on a case by case basis. Just because you tasted bad milk, doesn’t mean ALL milk is bad.
“uptownnc703, how can you possibly suggest that if the burned out shell had been torn down that a new building would have been built more quickly?” - Can’t really say since there aren’t any vacant lots on that stretch of Delaware, however this building burned 11 years ago. 11 years isn’t impressive either.
“When was the last new commercial building built in Allentown?” - This year - 591 Delaware
“No one in their right mind who wanted to build a new building would have selected that site if you could even build a new building on it with contemporary codes related to set-backs from lot lines, etc.” - Someone built a contemporary building on it, they just used the old façade.
“Get over it guys. There's no excuse anymore to let these old buildings fall down. If you really want them down, make an argument based on something other than "it's too far gone." - I’m not sure if you saw the pictures but structurally this was unsafe and a hazard to the community for 8+ years. Sounds like a decent reason.
Report this
fill
Personally, I'm totally in favour of restoring the exterior while finishing the interior in a contemporary manner - when there is nothing inside worth restoring. This reminds me of ancient buildings in villages along the "Romantische Strasse" in Germany south of Hanover. Many buildings are indeed ancient until you enter them and discover that the interiors are completely rebuilt and modern looking. I live near 591 Delaware and am thrilled by the careful attention to detail on the exterior.
Report this
MJWorthington
All this points out is that even if the inside is too long gone, it is possible to save the facade and build new with in it creating a great structure that keeps the street looking great.
Report this
RonR
I wish they would build with Brick more often. Down south, where I think brick and labor is cheaper, you find a lot of homes built with brick. Even the low income properties.
Report this
Charger
I'm not sure how the fact that the building stood unattended for 8 years without causing any damage or injury equates to it being a hazard to the community. Hazard is a very subjective thing, but since the building did not collapse it would seem reasonable to argue that keeping it up wasn't a mistake from a public safety standpoint.
As for the contemporary building issue. Sure this is a modern, LEED compliant, building in three walls of an old building, but I'm fairly sure (with my diploma from the Armchair U. School of Architecture) that it's the fact that those walls were still up, defining the outer edge of the building envelope that allowed the new building to be built (within them) as it was. Had there been just a vacant lot (and how likely is it that that wouldn't have been paved for parking?) a new building would have had to been further from the lot lines.
Apart from the insides of 591 Delware, when was the last new commercial structure built in Allentown?
Report this
WCPerspective
Last new structure in Allentown- my guess would be the Quaker Bonnet on Allen. ????
Report this
uptownnc704
I think the bigger point on last new construction in allentown is; has there been any opportunities for new construction in Allentown? Not really, not too many vacant lots, and certainly nothing a developer can tear down to build new without getting injunctions from the preservation society. (Otherwise the society isn't doing their job)
Now, before the preservation society gets on my case. I support the society and many of the things they do. Just a slightly more liberal view on what preservation is. And before anyone gets on my case about what preservation should be, we're all entitiled to have different viewpoints. That's what life is all about.
Report this
troy
WCP, No Quaker Bonnet on Allen is not a new structure. It was an old garage (I think) that had been there many years. If it wasn't a garage, it sure looked like one. It was just blank, concrete walls. They did an amazing job making it into something aesthetically pleasing.
Report this
WCPerspective
Actually there are several vacant lots along Allen Street begging for new development. Perfect locations for live/work units.
Report this
troy
My guess (just a guess) is that Walgreens on Delaware and North is Allentown's newest structure.
Report this
doc
Spectacular rebuild. I was wondering: if this is essentially a "new build", and I believe the general consensus is that this would qualify as a nearly total rebuild save the exterior walls, could more totally new buildings be constructed as exact replica's of earlier structures that have been torn down? I am thinking of more than a few surface parking lots where beautiful homes and commercial buildings once stood.
Report this
nicoleshoe
I think this is one of the most amazing architectural/engineering/building triumphs the city has seen. I remember going by it in recent years and seeng the progress. It is truly a beautiful and fantastic structure. Bravo!
Report this
scarmina
Matt and Chris deserve our thanks for the this daring quest. This has been a labor a love for them and as a fellow architect I am gratefull to see them invest in our city and to be one of the many who have put their money where their mouth is. Great job guys!!
Report this