Tailoring Government

Tailoring Government

Story Options

One of the constant refrains heard about local government is simply this: We have too much of it. We also have a variety of freethinking, innovative people, from the public and political sectors, who've tried to effect changes in what they see as top-heavy government. Some have managed to deconstruct what they consider surplus government, while others have fallen short, nearly undoing their own political careers.

"I had to look at it from a historical perspective," said Riverside Council Member Joe Golombek (pictured above with Niagara District Councilman, Dominic Bonifacio) about his push to downsize the Buffalo Common Council back in 1999. "We had less population than we had when the council grew to 13 members. The change to 9 members made working within the council easier. It had become the 'too many cooks' scenario."

Golombek cites Rochester, a city that has a part-time, 7-member council, made up of 4 district and 3 at-large members, saying that it works well for them. He said that the availability of Buffalo council members casts them in the role of ombudsmen or "little mayors", often fielding telephone calls from constituents who should be calling various service departments in the city. "We don't have natural disasters or terrorists; our political climate is our problem. We're over-governed."

On the other hand, Golombek said that the fact that council members are called by their constituents demonstrates that they work well with the city and county. That brings him to the topic of county government: "I don't understand why we have it. It puts the City of Buffalo in the position of subsidizing the suburbs, like Amherst and Williamsville. Why should the poorest municipality take care of the wealthiest?"

Niagara District Councilman Dominic Bonifacio has a slightly different take on the council. "Just because population has dwindled doesn't mean we have less problems. The loss creates multiple problems through vacant properties," said Bonifacio. He has been known to personally mow the lawns of vacated properties in his district.

Bonifacio, who will be retiring this coming January, has concerns regarding downsizing, saying that dividing the city into four compass points with a central overseer would work if it weren't for the fact that certain areas, with their multiple dwelling units, outweigh others by large numbers of constituents. That's why he favors keeping the council at its current size and redistricting it, saying, "We become blinded if we don't look more closely at things."

Hardwick.jpg

Canisius College Political Science Professor Kevin R. Hardwick, PhD (above), said that the move to 9 council members from 13 was good, but that a council of 7 would probably work with some redistricting. Furthermore, he doesn't discount the importance of the symbolic role a council member plays with constituents, joking that, "It's hard to reach out and strangle a bureaucracy." He goes on to point out that Columbus, Ohio, at double the population, is doing quite well with 5 council members.

Hardwick feels strongly that the county legislature is where we continue to be a culture of waste. Being a county legislator is not a full time job, according to Hardwick, yet the 15 legislators are earning more than 42 out of 50 state senators. "The example is set by the people at the top," Hardwick said. "If the boss is ordering lobster..."

Hardwick also discussed the “city vs. suburbs problem”: There's a naturally occurring Robin Hood effect on people within the city, whereby people who live in the nice parts of town help those who don't. "Segregation by class and race are often the same thing, and people with resources help people with needs," Hardwick asserted. "But if a person makes a move from Delaware Park to Clarence, the city can't tap into those people anymore, which makes Buffalo dependent on external sources. The city needs the county for that.

"There's a need for regional government if it's being used properly. If we were to consolidate, the county would be a tremendous resource of centralized political services. We'd share fire, police, and sales tax revenue," Hardwick said. "You don't want to take away from the City of Buffalo."

andrew.jpg

The way Andrew Rudnick, President and CEO of the Buffalo Niagara Partnership (above), sees it, politics took a wrong turn in the 60s and 70s when the economy started going down the tubes. "Political jobs became a source of employment. Elected officials were employed by the people in order to get jobs in return. As a result, government became huge."

The public also tends not to be able to separate the office from the incumbent office holder, according to Rudnick. "Joel Giambra ran a bully pulpit like he said he would," Rudnick said. "The role of the executive is to administer a fairly pedestrian set of services, but on a larger scale; unlike city stuff, it's highly visible. But let's not blow things out of perspective with things that are important to our particular lives. The role is fixed. Government shouldn't be more than that."

Rudnick made note of the fact that the goal of Giambra's administration was to cut taxes, "But he didn't cut expenses. He cut revenue, but not spending, and the gap resulted in the red/green budget," Rudnick said.

The resultant frustration from cultural institutions and entities such as the Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) became sticking points in the management of county funds. "Dollars to the CVB was good economics for the county," according to Rudnick. Those funds are considered great marketing tools for each municipality and for the region as a whole.

"There are four things," Rudnick said, "that the incoming county executive will have to address...policy priorities for the business audience." They are as follows:

• use of the bed tax as a framework for regrowth

• a balance of services-to-expenditures through labor contracts and taking into account projected budget problems in the 2009-2010 fiscal year

• the role of the control board and how the incoming county executive will work with it

• the county's role in stimulating private sector investment and jobs

"The CVB's ability to recruit visitors and businesses depends on the willingness of government to work to bring people in, whether by tax abatements or dedicated taxes for growth enterprises," said Rudnick.

"Bed tax dedicated to the CVB results in an upsurge of visitors, who spend more dollars, and raise the level of the bed tax. That allows us to go forward," Rudnick said. "We need to market at a level equal to our peers."

prometheus233.com half banner

Tags

What Others Have To Say

  1. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 14:55

    There are many ills in Buffalo but sadly as long as there is a what's mine attitude over a whats ours, nothing will change.

    Move to a city manager form of Government. Make the office of the mayor a part time job. Shrink the Common Council to 7 seats and have those 7 people appoint a City manager. The only way for Buffalo to make the necessary moves is to put people in power who do not have to get elected and play the "game" so to speak. A part time mayor could act as a cheerleader for the city, while a city manager could act like a CEO.

    In regards to Golombek, he is a fool. The city does not come close to subsidizing areas like Amherst and Clarence. In fact it is the other way around. Two thirds of the county live outside of the city. Buffalo is only the "center" because of tradition not necessity. Sure it is the center for arts and culture but that is because of what happened 100 years ago. One can argue that more commerce is located outside of the city then in.

    I am a huge fan of a regional form of government. I am a firm believer that Buffalo should be the center of WNY. I am also realistic in understanding that Buffalo is not close to having the power in Erie county that some think. I am realistic in knowing that if a regional government were to happen, it would be the suburbs that should call the shots and not the city.

  2. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 15:05

    the fact is, you have to call my common council member to get anything done. they are the closest and most accessable elected officials in the government. and, for the miniscule percentage that the wages cost within the city budget, id prefer to keep them at current levels.

    now, dont strike me down for saying this, but id even reinstate the larger council without the at-large seats. am i crazy, or am i just desperate for an advocate for the citizens of buffalo (yes to both)?

    we all know the feeling of calling some city department and getting nowhere.

    a friend of mine had a drug dealer next to him. crackheads looking into his windows. guess what. he called the nonemergency line, but the police didnt respond. but you better believe his common councilmember did. and despite my friend being outside his district, and to his credit, Council Member Golombek did.

    i long ago learned my lesson never to call city departments directly. you could be in voice mail purgatory until the rapture (not to say i havent gotten some very good prompt help calling the city). however, calling your common councilmember is one stop shopping. they know who to contact, and what to do about it. and what about those folks who dont even know what byzantine department they should be contacting.

    hey, maybe if anything, we should get rid of the mayor and create a parlimentary style council.

  3. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 15:11

    i do understand columbus,oh allows for a voter recall. im all for that!

  4. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:01

    Al,

    While it is great that your friend got assistance from Golombek, the problem is he had to go to him in the first place. Council members should be working on big picture items not things like this. While it was great that he helped out, his time and office should have been doing something on a bigger scale. This is unless Golombek was able to get heads to roll at the police department or Golombek started to work on improving the nonemergency line response time.

    I am sure that you are not the only person who has the attitude of going to your council member first. The problem with this is by the lack of action by the departments in the first place, your actions in bypassing the departments AND council members continuing to field and respond to these calls, the position of a council member has been reduced to a facilitator not a policy maker.

    If departments are not working, heads need to roll. Not change the role of another position in government simply because they pick up the phone.

  5. MRodgers

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:50

    RonR and Al, you are both right in various senses. It's true, the Common Council person gets things done, BUT - they are needed as Legislators, not as community liaisons. However, it seems moot to call the Help Line (Mayor's Call & Resolution Center) since you also have to call the councilperson's office to affect the change needed within a reasonable amount of time. What I would suggest is that the operators on the call desks are divided up to be personal assistants/liaisons for each of the nine councilmembers. Then the call takers can work proactively with the legislative aides in constituent needs for each district while also being educated on the issues of that district enough to formulate solutions for the issues that are inherent to the district.

    Of course, all this info can be shared by the staff of each district office to possibly show need for enforcement of some already on the books ordinances and laws and also the amendment of some of the current laws and codes.

    Nick has a real good point regarding multiple dwellings and the number of people in a district - each district has its inherent needs due to multiple dwelling units, numbers of social service agencies and housing for their patients, etc., etc. Also, looking at the map of vacant dwellings and crime provides a cleaer picture of the needs of each district and the need for a council person to assure the understanding at government level of the residents of those areas.

    You want to merge something - merge the call takers with each councilmember's office to really get the best bang for your buck. That's streamlining.

  6. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 17:32

    Ron & Marylin, dont get me wrong i couldnt agree more that the need to go to a common council member is a symptom of the much larger issue: nonresponsive city government.

    for example, a car knocked over a streetlight on my block 7 months or so ago, ive called the mayors complaint line - i mean call resolution center, nimo, and my common council member. what do i have? a wire filled cone that has yet to provide any nighttime illumination. im guessing that sooner or later the wires will get crossed up, then FIAT LUX! problem solved. sorta.

    im sure in kenmore, it would have been repaired by the next morning.

    lack of resopnsiveness is clearly one of the key issues that keeps people out of the city (crime & schools being the others). oh jobs? well, im sure they would follow if we could get our shiii. . . em, stuff straight.

    alas, alas.

  7. MRodgers

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 17:43

    SPOT ON, Al!

  8. kahawa

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 18:05

    Does Rudnick remember the expanded government largess that results from politicians handling out contracts to private companies in exchange for campaign funds? It works that way, too.

  9. NBJOHN

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 20:53

    When will we reach bottom with this government????? Last one left, turn out the lights

  10. RisingDamp666

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 22:33

    City-County consolidation. Nashville, Louisville, Indianapolis, Jacksonville...did any of them regret it? Buffalo N.Y. pop. 946,000. There you have it.

  11. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 11:38

    risingdamp666,

    dont all of those cities have a cross jurisdictional unified school district? that is another key to revitalize buffalo. if your kid went to the same school district where you lived on east ferry or clarence center the city would become a much more attractive place for families.

    but we all know the sad truth. there is little to no chance that there will ever be a consolidated county school district.

    perhaps there is an alternative to grow our city by expansion: a borough system with a confederation of governments is a bit more likely to be palatable to our suburban friends. the borough of kenmore or lackawanna has its own mayor - a borough president, if you will. its own schools district (we all know why), a semi-independant police department.

  12. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 13:56

    Al.

    Never thought about the borough system. GREAT IDEA!!!!

  13. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 15:29

    Ronr,

    say there was a limited borough system of kenmore(pop. 16426), lackawanna(19064), and sloan(3775). buffalos population (based what wikipedia told me) would rise from 279,745 to 319,010. thereby taking us from 69th largest to 59th, just ahead of pitt.

    not too bad!

  14. RonR

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 19:58

    Add Amherst and see how far you move up.

    I think Amherst would go for it if you left alone Police and Schools. Everything else, residents would see the light. But not on Police and Schools.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links