UB's Comprehensive Plan Released

UB's Comprehensive Plan Released

Story Options

The University at Buffalo released a draft of its comprehensive plan for its three campuses yesterday. In the plan, the North Campus would be the heart of the university's academic core, the Downtown Campus will be part of the "Medical Corridor" and the South Campus will hold the professional schools. The three components are as follows:

Downtown: medical education, clinical care, health sciences research, and research and development.
South: center of professional education in law, education, social work, executive education, and architecture and planning.
North: the academic heart of the university for the College of Arts and Sciences, the core of the undergraduate experience at UB, and the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

The hardest aspect of this reconfiguration will be moving the medical campus, but it seems only fitting that the School of Architecture and Planning would retain space on the South Campus in the historic triad of Hayes Hall, Crosby Hall and Parker Hall in the University Heights district.

Included in the plans is a transportation model connecting the three campuses that offers support for improvements like Bus Rapid Transit and reserves rights of way for future expansion of light rail or modern streetcar service. This goes a long way toward another of the plan's goal to improving the University's ecological design.

You can certainly leave your comments here for BRO readers after reading the draft plan, but don't neglect to weigh in with opinions on the University's site, as UB is soliciting comments from the community.

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. B-LoLawStu

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 09:57

    Law School should be Downtown with the big firms and court houses.

  2. paragon

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 10:59

    A rail link to all 3 campus' would go a long way to linking students to downtown.

  3. carlmalone

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 11:28

    UB should build a massive southtown campus and link with metro. Private businesses should step up to the plate and pay for both the capus and metro out of their own monies. The unemployed should all be employed. The sky should be red. Why New York State refuses to address this issue is beyond me. We should all be over 6'0 tall; metro should be extended to everyones home, and it should pay us to ride it. The poor should be rich and the rich should be poor. We should all have wings and be able evaporate when we want. The government should pay for all of this...

  4. blackrocklifer

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 12:45

    paragon- That was the plan until the good people of Amherst shot it down. Couldn't have city people (and black) taking that train to their private enclave.

  5. bhorvath

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 13:04

    Blifer -

    If true, I think it's strange that the folks of Amherst could even have such power on an issue like this.

    The whold county/city could vote on these types of things if the city and sorrounding locales incorporated into a single entity, with townships. Then there would only be "amherst folks" as a part of a larger whole. Then the whole could shoot down the "amhersts".

    Didn't a control board recommend this type of incorporation? Or something like it.

    The TYRANNY of your local politicians is worthy of revolt. They have no vision of the future.

    What would happen if absolutely NOBODY voted in the next set of local elections?

    BOYCOTT THE VOTE IN ERIE COUNTY!!

  6. livesintheburbsworksinthecity

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 13:17

    blackrocklifer: was that really the plan? Is there some type of documentation of this? Almost every article on BRO has a comment of how the metro should run to this location or that one. Is any of this feasible? Where exactly would the tracks run? I'm not being sarcastic, I'd really be interested in this. For example: how do we get the trains from UB Main Street to the Amherst Campus? Finally, even without the trains going between all three, I'm willing to bet that there are plenty of buses that do. Do we know the ridership statistics from these buses? Is there demand for the train to begin with?

  7. urbansoul

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:09

    Is it me, or doesn't it seem the Architecture/Planning should be downtown as well?

  8. Colin

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:09

    This is a real improvement over the current setup. My only concern is that the medical school buildings on south campus would be hard to convert to different uses.

  9. blackrocklifer

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:23

    bhorvath, lives in the burbs- The light rail began in 1978 and was completed in 1985. The reason given for not extending to the north campus was declining population/ ridership and cost which was way over budget. No doubt these were a factor but opposition from Amherst was there from the begining and behind the scenes pressure was applied. I had an uncle who was involved in this effort and remember the debate about "city people" taking the train out to commit crimes in Amherst.

  10. sbrof

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:40

    livesintheburbs. There are literally millions of trips per month on the UB stampede buses. I forgot the numbers exactly but they alone would support and warrant the needed (not including any commuters) for an extension. The number of people riding between campuses and on campus alone is huge. There can never be enough buses to handle the peak demands of this traffic. No one feels satisfied while using the system. Didn't when my father attended or when I attended, or now with new students.

    As for your documentation question. Yes there is on both sides of the route. You can go downtown and review the very original plan for the MetroRail, from downtown to South campus. On the south campus section they have an arrow that points to North Campus.

    On all site plans from the construction of buildings on north campus you can see very clearly marked where the NFTA line would enter campus from the west and run along the spine from south campus. One of the whole reasons for building the metrorail was BECAUSE they chose to put the campus in Amherst and NOT downtown. It was how to keep the live and vitality that city needs from leaving.

    The exact route to connect the two campuses.. there isn't any. Probably would have just ran on Millersport to North, options to go by the new and growing commercial center around the BLVD Mall but nothing was finalized. One of the main reasons that Metro is considered a train to and from noqhere is because it's actual reason to exist was never fufilled. It was never meant to stop at South.. That would have been bad planning. It needs to go North. The city needs the life that the students can bring and the students need to life the city can offer. That is the only thing to take away the sour bland existence thousands of students think of when they think of Buffalo.

  11. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:43

    Colin, if you look at the details, many of those buildings would be taken down and replaced with more appropriate structures for the new schools.

  12. jamesbflo

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 14:44

    wonder if moving the undergrads off of Main will hurt that commercial district? bars in particular.

  13. Aloha

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 15:04

    james, According to Business First, "Under the plan, an additional 2,000 students, faculty and staff would be located at UB South, university officials said..." So there'd actually be an increase in population on the South Campus.

  14. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 15:13

    @ livesintheburbsworksinthecity

    If I am not mistaken, the ORIGINAL plan was for the Metro to be underground in the city and go above grade out to the burbs. For some reason this was flipped.

    Because the project was a public project, there were HUGE delays and cost overruns. Also at the time of construction, the method used to build the below grade sections was cut and cover. Tunnel boring machines, for whatever reasons, were not used during this time. Because of this, a LARGE part of the reason Amherst did not want the extension is Amherst did not want to have their roads jacked up for YEARS on end to build the thing. Yes there was some fear that access for criminals would be provided but it was really about economics and the quality of life DURING construction.

    If the money was there today, a massive network of heavy rail could be laid with the use of TBMs and there would be little to no disturbance to the above ground street grid.

    Current TBM's can bore about 20 meters a day if they go 20 hours a day with 4 hours of maintenance. A direct line from the University Station to UB, under Grover Cleveland and Millersport is around 5900 meters. So a direct line could be done in under a year. Add in another year or two to build the stations...UB North could be connected to UB South and the City in under 3 years. IF there was the money. But we all know there is not...

  15. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 15:19

    @James

    I also think the age of the student population will increase near the South Campus...which will actually help the area. I lived off Callodine years ago and it was filled with mostly under 21 kids. If the South campus becomes more of a Graduate School campus, the University area will be much better off. Law Students are much better neighbors than Sophomores in General studies IMO.

  16. blackrocklifer

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 15:48

    RonR- "A LARGE part of the reason Amherst didn't want the extension is Amherst did not want their roads jacked up for years" I think you are being generous in buying this "cover story". I followed this story at the time and it was pretty clear why Amherst fought the extension. Even some ugly comments on the local news and in the papers that left no doubt how Amherst residents felt.

  17. RonR

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 16:07

    @blackrocklifer

    Followed the story where? Were you a resident of Amherst? Did you go to the town board meetings? Did you speak with Amherst residents? Me thinks no.

    You were most likely spoon fed info from the News. Which has been and currently is opinion oriented. Just look at the perspective of Amherst on BRO. Not too friendly. Hell, to an outsider, Amherst looks like the Devil if you just read the drivel posted here by people like David Steel and other commentators.

    Like I said before, a LARGE reason, if not the main reason Amherst said no was the cost and the way the system was built. They had years of watching the mess as they drove from their homes into the city and said thanks but no thanks.

    As for the potential crime...yes that was another factor. But can you blame them. Were they off base. Look at the border between Amherst and Buffalo compared to the rest of Amherst.....

  18. Buffalo21stcentury

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 16:53

    I hope UB experiences alot of growth to fill these campus's.

    I specifically see a future where there are 4-5 campuses. How? Well Jack Davis gave millions to construct a 4k sqft clean room for nanotechnology. Nanotechnology that Buffalo State is partnering as I have said they should. UB specializing in advanced r&d, engineering while Buffalo State specializes in basic r&d, technology application. Such a combination would make Buffalo State the 4th Campus.

    If nanotechnology research gets large enough it could split off as the life sciences did into its own research campus making it the 5th campus....though I doubt that would happen anytime soon....

    But if Buffalo State continues to intelligently partner with UB, then the potential for growth at Buffalo State along Grant, Niagara, Tonawanda and Amherst is extremely significant....perhaps significant enough to consider reactivating the Belt Line.

    Considering Buffalo's economy I think everyone would like to see Buffalo State have another 5-10,000 students and UB another 10-20,000 students.

  19. heathersmiles

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:14

    We want to move the Niagara Thruway because of the detrimental impact it has on the Blackrock neighborhood, but we are ok with running a train through an Amherst neighborhood.

    BRL is a racist hypocrite.

  20. heathersmiles

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:15

    We want to move the Niagara Thruway because of the detrimental impact it has on the Blackrock neighborhood, but we are ok with running a train through an Amherst neighborhood.

    BRL is a racist hypocrite.

  21. al-alo

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:40

    highways have CO2, fumes and particulate matter. adjacent highways diminish property values.

    light rail has no emissions (at least not along the right of way). light rail raises property values.

    heathersmiles is an uninformed troll.

  22. bhorvath

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:44

    I live in the heart of a city Black Rock Lifer. Not Buffalo.

    I think I'm at the top of the circle again. Perhaps having my 3rd epiphany of the pointlessness of this blog. Most vocal people on it don't even live in Buffalo. That must mean something. Not too many actually living there give a whole lot about the issues on this blog - that must mean something too. Maybe they have different issues.

    Save them Obi Wan, you're their only hope.

  23. blackrocklifer

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:49

    RonR- As I said in my previous post, My uncle (from Amherst) was involved in the effort to stop the extension. He was involved in Amherst politics for many years and our family events were always the scene of political debate about the issues of the day. I also spent a lot of time in Amherst and know what is said about the city and minorities. I think the reason Amherst "looks like the devil" is because they have a record of aggressively pirating business from Buffalo with their IDA. Also their arrogance claiming their success was "self made" when in reality it was the North Campus and the huge infusion of tax dollars that made this town into what it is today.

  24. blackrocklifer

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:55

    bhrovath- You misunderstood, I was responding to you and livesintheburbsworksinthecity. Not saying you live in the burbs.

  25. bhorvath

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 17:59

    Ahhhh,

    I do need to read posts more thoroughly as Steel suggests.

  26. buffawakening

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 18:06

    "Also their arrogance claiming their success was "self made" when in reality it was the North Campus and the huge infusion of tax dollars that made this town into what it is today."

    i would beg to differ. even if the campus was never build i would think amherst would turn out the way it is right now. after all how would you explain the successes of other suburbs, such as Lancaster, east Aurora and Clarence?

  27. carlmalone

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 18:15

    I have no idea why we can't just a build a giant job factory which would employ everyone for life. We could build it in Lackawana, make it green, no emissions, Leeds certified, and run a a super deluxe levitating high speed rail system underground which could pick everyone up, say at 10am every morning. It is so simple why can't we all just see the possibilities.

  28. al-alo

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 18:16

    and by the way ~ Bus Rapid Transit sucks.

  29. blackrocklifer

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 18:32

    buff- Clarence is pretty small, East aurora tiny, Lancaster maybe half the population of Amherst.

  30. allfit

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 18:55

    Blackrocklifer - Another typical anti-suburb comment from you, surprise, surprise.

  31. blackrocklifer

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 19:46

    allfit- thanks for being polite in your sarcasm, heather called me a "racist hypocrite". The burbs haven't exactly played nice with Buffalo and I see no reason to pretend they do.

  32. sbrof

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 20:27

    There is a lot to say about North Campus being in Amherst compared to the rest of the region. What is the richest, most affluent town in all of WNY, Amherst... Hands down. What is one of the biggest employers and influx of capital, people, ideas, innovation in the region.... UB.. Its main campus has been in Amherst for the same time that Amherst has exploded. Sure they would probably be well off, like Aurora, or OP today but they would not be anything close to what they are without UB North.

    And that is ok. But to think it is somehow self made is to ignore history. UB is the reason highways go there and the infrastructure has been upgraded over the years. Do you think Millersport highway would have gotten that huge redo a couple years back without UB north. Probably not considered at least 50% of the traffic volume on that road is UB related. Think about it for a second how HUGE UB is. 28k students, 10+ well paid faculty and staff.... most of which live, shop and pay taxes in Amherst cause they want to be near work. That is about the same population as the entire town and Village of Orchard Park.

    Take that population, money and innovation away and amherst would have never developed the way it did.

  33. B_lo_Kingz

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 20:37

    Blackrocklifer is correct about Amherst. I heard the same reasons for the train not being extended. Typical suburbans ganging up on Blackrocklifer. Tough to hear the truth Allfit , RonR and Heatheeer. Truth will bring change. Everybody knows Amherst was jus a farm area til UB came out there. Amherst really wanna become the city. We all hav to work together. BRL is keeping it real and its getting under some ppl feathers.

    RonR, what being a resident hav anything to do with knowing whats goin on in Amherst, like its in Canada? Its around the corner buddy. Where's ur documents stating Amherst didn't want the roads ripped up?

    Why do Buffalonians try to surpress the truth so much when it comes to race in this city and use reverse psychiatry like heatheeer did. The more u try to hide it, the more its gonna be thrown in ur face.

  34. B_lo_Kingz

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 20:43

    Blackrocklifer is correct about Amherst. I heard the same reasons for the train not being extended. Typical suburbans ganging up on Blackrocklifer. Tough to hear the truth Allfit , RonR and Heatheeer. Truth will bring change. Everybody knows Amherst was jus a farm area til UB came out there. Amherst really wanna become the city. We all hav to work together. BRL is keeping it real and its getting under some ppl feathers.

    RonR, what being a resident hav anything to do with knowing whats goin on in Amherst, like its in Canada? Its around the corner buddy. Where's ur documents stating Amherst didn't want the roads ripped up?

    Why do Buffalonians try to surpress the truth so much when it comes to race in this city and use reverse psychiatry like heatheeer did. The more u try to hide it, the more its gonna be thrown in ur face.

  35. whynot

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:05

    Let's be truthful about the situation then... Buffalo didn't want UB in Buffalo when they had the chance to expand it in Buffalo. The residents, in their myopic wisdom, thought it would be better to contain the unpredictable student population in a swamp in Amherst instead of unleashing them on the residential neighborhoods in Buffalo. Little did the people of Buffalo know that UB would have such a tremendous economic impact to Amherst and the surrounding communities while the City of Buffalo falls deeper and deeper into decline. You sound bitter like an ex-wife who divorced right before her husband became successful. You talk trash about his new wife, about what an asshole he is and how he won't share more of his money with you now that he has some to share.

    Bitter, Bitter, Bitter, spiteful, negative, contemptuous, and otherwise hateful Buffalonians. You think it hurts Amherst when you bash them? They have everything you want and you have everything they don't want. I agree with Blackrocklifer that maybe there is a massive conspiracy and plot to keep the poor and the minorities in the City so the property values and quality of education remain high.

    Buffalo made decisions without thinking about the ramifications of their decisions, sounds like typical Buffalo.

  36. carlmalone

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:12

    What's this about UB coming to City? Let me choose my words carefully: over my dead body...

  37. blackrocklifer

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:31

    whynot- It was the conservative business community that didn't embrace the idea of a downtown UB campus. Many citizens and small business owners were very supportive. I agree the political leadership failed to understand just how lucrative this campus could have been for the city. But I strongly disagree with the idea that "they (Amherst) have everthing you want" . Many of us choose to live in Buffalo because we value the quality of life that a city can provide. We only ask for a fair and level playing field. Carrying the regions burden of the poor and disenfranchised is too heavy a load for Buffalo alone.

  38. heathersmiles

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:39

    I believe that the people of Buffalo said the same thing in the 1970s... UB in the City over our dead bodies.

    Oops... bad decision.

    Black rock lifer - Do you whine this much in real life? Whah!

  39. allfit

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:49

    ^^ I agree, the victim mentality is apparent in almost every comment.

  40. blackrocklifer

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 21:56

    I often see criticism of PaulBuffalo and Steel and others for not living in Buffalo. heathersmiles (of Amherst) and Allfit (of Clarence) seem quite comfortable giving us their armchair view of what is wrong with our city. I guess as someone who lives here and knows a little about the problems we have it makes me think of Sarah Palin and her comment about understanding foreign policy because "she could see Russia from Alaska".

  41. NorPark

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 22:09

    Just glad to hear the School of Architecture and Planning are staying in Crosby Hall.

  42. buffawakening

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 20th 2008, 23:04

    blackrock- "Clarence is pretty small, East aurora tiny, Lancaster maybe half the population of Amherst"

    this is only because of their geographic boundries. if we look at it on an even playing field, by population per square mile, Lancaster and East aurora have actually larger numbers than Amherst. the suburbs in general grew, not just amherst. and its not because of the university, its because people wanted to get the heck out of the city.

  43. Buffalo21stcentury

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 01:57

    Personally, I hated the South Campus. Oh I loved the old buildings and some of the new medical buildings were cool but the difference between the South Campus and the North Campus are like Summer and Winter.

    UB Amherst is nearly completely connected along a spine on the first and second floors which is wonderful in the winter. I loved being all warm and toasty looking out the window in the cold weather.

    The South Campus is really nice in the summer if your taking a summer course but the fall, winter and spring..those quadrangles and multiple long outdoor walks every day were just horrible. The only thing to look forward to was when buildings were close together.

    I really think all this talk about UB Amherst is just wasted time. Look we have 4 state campuses here in WNY. 3 UB Campus's and 1 Buffalo State Campus.

    Why does UB get so much cr*p for Amherst while Buffalo State never gets any criticism for Forest, Grant, Tonawanda or Amherst. God knows Buffalo State needs dormatories, a stadium, small business incubators just for its current student population...and its refusing 10,000 students a year and refusing to increase enrollment.

    With the economy going down the pooper, this is an excellent time to bring up things like UB, Buffalo State, Light Rail, Lift Bridges, Central Terminal Rail/Bus/ParkNRide, etc...

    UB has a plan....good....now how much, how soon, and whats next because our local economy is in real danger...and local education, healthcare and infrastructure industries are needed more than ever.

  44. JohnB

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 02:16

    Same deal, regarding the subway/metro in DC. Georgetown, protested back in the day, 1970s, against putting the metro down M street. Concerns about blacks/poor people/undesireables coming into a rich persons neighborhood. Today, the merchants and people in G'Town, regret this decision, financially.

  45. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 07:17

    aside from the current conversation, the implementation and growth of UB would be a huge asset for all of WNY. Whether you live the City of Clarence. UB is one of the keys to our future, as it has been one of the stabilzation forces through 30 years of otherwise economic collapse around here.

    This is a plan that everyone should get behind and support, for us and our children's future. The world is quickly starting to replace the US as a center for academic excellence. We need to reinvest into our education system NOW. Before the next great ideas and their economic spin offs come from somewhere else.

    History is history, it is worthy to know and understand but this plan is about how to move forward. I think it does an amazing balancing act to provide a win win for everyone involved.

  46. whynot

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 12:29

    Blackrocklifer - Are you saying that only people within the boundaries of Buffalo proper have the right to talk about what happens in Buffalo? Does this mean that you, being a city resident, have no right to comment about the happenings in the suburbs?

  47. whynot

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 12:32

    One more thing blackrocklifer - you may want to go back to research the news articles and public opinion pieces surrounding the expansion of UB in Buffalo. You will find that mostly the residents objected to the move, especially those who were afraid that radical protests and riots would break out in their quiet neighborhoods.

  48. blackrocklifer

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 12:38

    whynot- Does anything ever happen in the suburbs? could you give me an example.

  49. carlmalone

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 12:53

    Rocker:

    One example would be UB North

  50. blackrocklifer

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 13:06

    carl- you got me, good point, should have seen that coming.

  51. whynot

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 13:34

    Blackrocklifer - If you are too blind to see for yourself, than there is no way for me to show you all the things that are happening in the suburbs. I am not about city vs. suburbs, but that seems to be your topic of choice.

  52. clockhill54321

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 15:21

    I think UB's got a good plan here. I like the functionality of the transportation plans, and the fitting designs and uses of the buildings that they're planning. With enrollment of 40,000 students and growing, channeling some of these, especially the older, more educated students, to the South Campus and the Medical Campus seems like a good way to infuse a little education (which incubates wealth) to the city of Buffalo. I wouldn't be surprised if the area immediately around Ellicott St would look completely different by the time UB 2020 is complete.

    Changes like this take at least 15 - 25 years to implement, and I fully support any entity that wants to invest money like this NOW, so that by the time I'm raising a family we can have doctors, students, etc living in these great old houses. Let's COMBINE the best of Amherst and Buffalo, instead of alienating both.

  53. Assaroni

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 20:02

    blackrocklifer needs a life...

  54. STEEL

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 21st 2008, 22:11

    RonR,

    Exactly what has David Steele Said about Amherst that you take issue with?

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links