Up it Goes- Waterfront Place Tower Underway

Up it Goes- Waterfront Place Tower Underway

Story Options

Waterfront Place is rising in more ways than one. Ellicott Development reports that it is at “around the 50 percent mark" in sales. With solid sales activity, the developer raised prices on many of the remaining units by ten percent two weeks ago. Suites in the 13-story mid-rise tower are priced from $295,240 to over $1 million for a penthouse. The tower is rising at about one floor per week and should be topped out by year end.

The views from the building promise to be spectacular. "We are able to confirm that portions of the lower floors will have excellent water views," says Chris Martoche of Ellicott Development. "We were a bit concerned, but now that we are physically able to stand on the floor levels, we are able to see that many of the units on residential floors one and two will have water views," he says.

3rd%20Residential%20Floor.JPG

Residences in the 49-unit tower range from 1,300 square feet for a one-bedroom unit to over 3,100 square feet in two penthouse units. Tower residences are expected to be ready for occupancy in October 2008. The first four of fifteen town homes will be completed this fall. On a pre-construction basis, townhomes are priced from $499,000.

3rd%20Residential%20Floor%20%282%29.JPG

202%20Roma%20-%20East%20View.JPG

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. distas

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 00:09

    Its beautiful isnt it??!! Its called NEW DEVELOPMENT!!!! Now if we could only reduce parts of the 190 into a blvd, then we REALLY have something!!!

  2. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 00:22

    City views or lake views? In Buffalo, we say, "Screw the lake!"

  3. Sulley

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 00:46

    Again... closed sales or reservations?

  4. platt4

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 01:06

    Sully or Sulley....what does it matter? Seeing that the building is still one year from completion I imagine committed with a deposit. Therefore off the market or SOLD.

  5. Sulley

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 01:43

    The units aren't sold until reservations held with a deposit are converted into hard contracts and closed.

    At least that's how it works in normal cities.

  6. chris69

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 02:13

    Well if I were them I would start pre-sales on the next tower and make that 15 stories or 20 stories. Maybe Im superstitious but I dont like 13 story buildings. Nevertheless, once this tower is sold I would start presales on Tower#2.....how nice it would be to drive along I190 and see high rise office buildings and residential towers.

    Still makes me wonder when development will cross I190?

    It would help if they got rid of the city court parking lot and reopened Genesee Street...and extended Genessee Street under I190 to Lakefront Boulevard.

  7. Fudgeworth

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 02:13

    Is the penthouse still available?

    I am going to buy it.

    Positive thinking for the win.

  8. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 08:14

    It will be nice to see a tower constructed!

  9. skarnath

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 08:50

    i'll repeat what i said about this project on august 30th:

    "the shame of this infill waterfront project is that it isn't what it could & should have been. paladino's response to the city's request for proposals was not only late, it did not address any of the selection priorities - including extension of genesee street to the waterfront, mixed-use, a range of incomes & price points (starting at $150k), sidewalks, public space, public art & other new urbanist principles. norstar's proposal was on time and addressed almost all of these issues. their design was weak, but that could have been negotiated had they been selected. downtown neighborhood development (dnd) corp., which drafted the rfp, rightfully refused to review the paladino proposal & strongly recommended the norstar proposal. for a variety of reasons, none of them defensible, the city chose paladino. norstar chose not to sue, needing the city's support on a variety of other projects, and the dnd board decided to dissolve the corporation rather than continue a charade. real life...in the big city... "

    no - it wouldn't have fixed all the previous planning mistakes, but it would have been a start to making it less of a gated community for the very wealthy, which essentially is what it is now. and many of the current residents who opposed the thought of 600 sq.ft. units @ $150k for young professionals would have realized how much vitality they bring with them...

  10. Jefferson

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:03

    I agree with Chris69. Buffalo needs to capitalize on its proximity to Lake Erie and don't think it has been.

  11. Jefferson

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:04

    that should read "I don't think it has been"

  12. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:12

    but skarnath politicians are too infatuated with what they can get done NOW before their election cycle is over, it doesn't matter what is best for the city or our long term vision... While I am not opposed to this tower or project, it does shed light on how much BETTER our city could be if we had forward thinking politicians.. Take this as a note for everyone to go VOTE because while we like to complain about politicians in the end we only have ourselves to blame for our apathy and voter turnout.

  13. halljd39

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:13

    So, with all this new construction, are new people moving here or are these going to be fillled with people who already live here? If the population of Buffalo is declining, people from the 'burbs must have an interest in City and or Downtown living. I don't blame them, the CIty has much more to offer - and the best food around - among other things.

  14. hodgepodge

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:15

    everything looks nice but was it really necessary to grant this developer -- and the new owners -- tax credits which will allow them to pay far less city property taxes on a $500K house than what I pay for my little old house? gee, thought paladino didn't believe in public handouts?

  15. manski

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:36

    "The units aren't sold until reservations held with a deposit are converted into hard contracts and closed. At least that's how it works in normal cities."

    OK Sully are you serious? First of all it has nothing to do with what city it's in real estate closings are the same everywhere in New York state. You CAN'T close on a new construction condo unit until the construction of at least the unit is completed, sometimes until the whole project is completed depending on the loan program you have with the lender. A sold unit the developer refers to is a unit under contract that most likely has a 10% deposit down.

  16. Sulley

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 09:48

    Sold to me (and others outside of New York State) means that the unit is actually sold -- not held with a deposit.

    Many buyers who put down refundable deposits for units actually back out of the deal. That's commonplace anywhere. I would say that half of the reserved units at this point will be converted to actual contracts.

    So, In this case, around 50% of the units are "reserved."

  17. Spaulding97

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 10:19

    Chris69, are there plans for another tower or is this your idea. I don't remember another tower announced. I do agree with you though, I would love to see a 20 storey residential go up in this area or in the CBD. But why is this one right in front of the thruway?!

  18. STEEL

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 10:39

    Sulley, Before you blather on any further do you know that the deposits are refundable? In most cases they are not. If the developer has approval of the condo offering he can take non refundable deposits which is what the bank would have asked for before providing funding. That means he has a pending contract which is the same as any pending contract for the sale of any house or condo. That does not mean you can not back out. Anyone can back out of any deal anywhere if they are willing to forgo their deposit. (something which has become common place in Miami the last few months). So Sulley where is this mystical place that you live in that people get their deposits back?

  19. Sulley

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 10:56

    When I agreed to purchase a condo in 2005 before moving to Buffalo, I reserved a condo with a refundable $5,000.00 deposit, paid with an official bank cheque. When I did move, it was before the period in which reservations had been converted to contracts, so the money was refunded with another bank cheque.

  20. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:04

    Between the 190, Blue Cross, this privatized waterfront condo area, rail lines and all the other obstructions (city hall ramp, convention center, hyatt....I've put the genesee-waterfront connection on the backburner. Right now, the better solution for connecting downtown to the water appears to be pearl and erie streets. Pearl will run directly into the inner harbor and Erie can be reconfigured easily to actually be a prime bridge location to the outer harbor. I'm pretty sure the Erie St. connection has been studied briefly in the past, and I know its being looked at in greater depth now. Because of all the privatized residences, even if Genesee is extended to the water, there will be little opportunity for public access and development.

  21. STEEL

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:17

    Well Sulley then Buffalo must be special in that developers can get construction loans without any guaranty of being able to close on any contracts (which can not be done until the project is finished in any city). Other than that I am not sure what you point is. He is building the project and has commitments for half of the project before the 3rd floor has been started.

  22. vgs

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:35

    Why is there an arguement about deposits and questions about wether these units are ACTUALLY sold. Sully do you have some deep seeded and pessimistic belief that this deveopemnet can not possibly happen in Buffalo. It looks pretty much like it is going to happen, you know judging by the fact that the building is going up. Who gives a shit if the unites are sold, it's Paladino's money not yours. I am quite sure Carl has got his business plan together but maybe you should call him and voice your concern and thoughts about contracts and deposits. He might say thank you and I never thought about securing my deposits. And maybe Uniland has no idea what they are doing either since they are building a high rise condo also.

  23. Hospitable

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:40

    Wow... are you haters upset because someone did something with some of our waterfront?? Notice I said some of our waterfront, not all, in fact its a very small part of the bigger picture and the total land mass we have to develop here... get over it... so what if its a gated community..thats what rich people do.

    Townline... I agree... don't see a new Genessee any time soon... traffic on Main will come first.

    Distas... it would do wonders for this development and any others if the skyway and the 190 were walkable... the whole thing doesn't even need to be lowered... if I had to guess I'd say 40% of it.. another wishh lol

  24. hodgepodge

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:43

    vgs; it's not all paladino's money--some of it is ours (the taxpayers' money). see my ealier post Uhuge tax credits/breaks to the owners). wish it was true that "it's Paladino's money not yours"

  25. Sulley

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 11:53

    No hate here, though I wish the waterfront was a bit more open to the rest of the city and wasn't like some closed off subdivision. Can't have it all, though.

    It just annoys me when people say a development is "sold out" or almost sold, when it fact it's just reserved. I find it even funnier after the building is completed that the developer has units on the market because people have backed out of their reservations. I'm sure Paladino will have quite a few units listed on the MLS when it's finished too, just like many other developments.

  26. bjfan82

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 13:18

    Sulley, the only thing that matters is that there are cranes in the air and the building is going up. To me, whether it is 'sold out' already or if it takes a month or two after completion to sell every unit is pretty irrelevant. Not sure where you're trying to take this conversation or what your point is.

  27. SilentMajority

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 13:45

    JOBS JOBS JOBS! That's what development means to me! Keep the it coming... and keep the hard woking people of Buffalo... working! Anyone know much about the contractors on projects like this? Even if they aren't all local atleast they are spending some of their money in Buffalo. Congrats to the downtown restaurants who I'm sure are enjoying the runoff from all this development.

  28. flyguy

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 14:52

    We have that big chunk of "public" land over there aty LaSalle Park. Why not actually capitalize on that resource and make a tremendous push to get that park revitalized and actually develop the big plans that were proposed for it? Why attack new development in the downtown area, an area that has seen nothing of any significance ni many years. Only now within the last year or two do we see some positive change and yet people bash it? Whats wrong with having luxury condos on the waterfront. Its as an earlier post had said, its only a small piece of the waterfront. Dont sit there and complain about something that can help reverse the perception that nothing is happening in Buffalo and its just an old beat up city. This is a new building in a highly visible area for many people who pass through on their way to the Falls from out of town. With HealthNow and this tower and the new courthouse and Issa's Tower (crossing my fingers), an improved Dulski, all the sudden downtown will start taking on a look of activity, of new mixed with tremendously valuable historic structures. Its the best of both worlds. Lets not knowck this please. We can even realize the potential of the public waterfront area we have let alone add more. If you want more waterfront access then add the public park land along the outer harbor and develop glimmering new high rises back away from the water with waterfront views nonetheless. High rises buildnigs can be inspiring and make a statement about a city like it or not.

  29. flyguy

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 14:57

    I agree about the 13 stoey thing as well. Cant we just tack on at least one more floor just so it doesnt top out on 13? Isnt it customary to avoid topping out on 13? I'm not superstitious about the number of floors but isnt it custom to avoid 13? Maybe its just an excuse to go a bit higher.

  30. RonR

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 15:04

    hodgepodge - Sorry but a tax credit is not your money or the money of the taxpayer.

    Question? How much money did the city bring in on this property last year?

    Question? How much money will the city bring once this property is built?

    The tax credits have been around for years and they are part of this zone. Additional to this, once the credits are gone, these units will pay more then their fair share in property taxes.

    People claim that there is no long term vision in Buffalo but fail to see it when it is right under your nose. If it takes tax credits of 10 years to get new construction done in the city and NOT BY THE CITY AND FOR THE CITY (projects) SO BE IT!!!

    The way I see it, the taxes in Buffalo are tolerable because of cost of housing for the most part is cheap. When you own a home north of 400k, you are contributing WAY more then you take out. This goes for existing homes over 400K and new builds. If our waterfront is ever going to be a "great place" it needs to have great housing stock and not just affordable housing. While there should be both, I would like to see anyone say there is too much high end housing in the city. We all know there is not.

    So if it takes some credits to the pioneers who are willing to invest and risk hundreds and thousands of dollars and build Buffalo so be it. Just calling it like I see it.

  31. hodgepodge

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 15:34

    RonR, my friend -- a tax credit may not be my money but, to me, there is something wrong when an owner of a $400,000 home pays less taxes than an owner of, let's say, a $200,000 home. no? a previous post about a similar topic suggested that many BRO readers do not understand market-forces. would market forces have prevented this project if paladino did not receive such credits? and, by the by, why after 10 years do u believe that these homes will pay "more" than their fair share? aren't taxes based in large part on property values? what gives?

  32. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 15:41

    I can see how a current resident of the waterfront villiage can be put off by the tax credit. I wonder if they considered an "area discount" to benefit all of those who have invested in waterfront villiage. I am not complaining though, I think this tower is going be great for area. Every development like this leads to more attractive, profitable waterfront. I want to throw a spin on the 13 floor worries. I would call Buffalo "America's unlickiest city" so I think the 13 floor building suits it well.

  33. SLEEPL8

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 15:46

    **unluckiest**....there is pleanty of lick around here...

  34. bfloBR

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 15:52

    Skarnath...you make an excellent point; since the RFP went out and the City made the proposals public, I have been thinking the same thing. What is unfortunate is that the political background that rears its nasty head into development of prime locations in Buffalo. You can chalk this award to Paladino as a parting gift from Masiello for all the contributions Paladino made to Tony over the years. I like to believe that with Tobe running economic development and permits for the City, and a more progressive minded administration, that favortism to the same old developers who have been raping downtown for decades has ended. One can only hope.

  35. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 16:28

    hodge -

    I can see your point but take the numbers and spread them out over 20 years. The property taxes paid on a 400K property will even out over time and they properties will contribute more then their fair share.

    I think that any tax bill for a single family home over 12k is ridiculous and most developers do as well. Thus the reason for a slow development of high end homes. Now you may counter that some people already pay this and I agree. But those homes are already built. There is no spin off to the economy. The benefit to the local economy off this construction project alone warrants the breaks.

    The finishes in this place are going to put a lot of skilled craftsmen to work. Instead of a 1 piece shower stall, there will be ceramic tile. Instead of carpet, there will be hardwood floors. Instead of fabricated counters, there will be granite. Instead of cabinets from Home Depot, they will be custom. Not all construction workers are the same.

    Additional to this....

    The reason why I am ok with the breaks is because of the risk. If you buy a home near Delaware park for over 400k, you already know the quality of housing surrounding it. It is a safe bet. On the water, it is a much different story. With the city and its fetish with subsidized housing, it would not shock me to see some type of project built next door.

    For any real estate market to "boom" or even expand, there needs to be risk takers. The market is not strong enough to force these risks. So until it is, I am ok with rewarding those risk takes. Furthermore, ANYONE can buy these places. So someone who is getting gouged in the burbs might move back into the city because of the breaks. This is a good thing. Someone moving to the area will pay 400K here instead of 400k in Clarence because of the breaks. That is a good thing.

  36. nick

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 16:31

    The 10-year tax abatement has done wonders here in Philly, it has rejuvinated Center City and created much development that would not have happen but for the abatement. Clearly it is better to not give tax abatements where the market will build new structures, but clearly any incentives that can spur development should be utilized.

  37. skarnath

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 28th 2007, 20:22

    even if you discount the fact that paladino didn't play by the rules of the rfp, the bottom line is that the city had a much better option in hand, and ignored it. the city could have had a project with more units, some of which were affordable to young professionals, which would have generated more taxes and more benefits to the city. the city could have made a good business decision. instead, it made a political decision. with regard to downtown, the city no longer needs to act like a beggar with his hand out, grateful for any crumbs that developers deign to drop. most developers are risk averse, as are investors and lenders in their projects. that's why if the city doesn't set the rules of the game, developers will take the path of least resistance. that is what happened here, and the city gets a project that is less in every way than it could and should be.

  38. hodgepodge

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 29th 2007, 09:35

    skarnath has said it much better than me. was this open to competition for other developers? If so, the credits are more palatable. if no other developers were given a shot, or if paladino was given preferrential treatment by the former mayor (my hunch), then the credits really piss me off. by the by, when will the City allow the marine drive apartments to be sold and put on the tax rolls?

  39. sally

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 29th 2007, 13:15

    flyguy - the residential portion is only 11 stories the other two is parking. The penthouse is listed as being on floor 11. See their website. No concern about having a address on the 13th flor is needed. The other 2 floors are simply parking.

  40. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 29th 2007, 17:49

    Under the Donald Trump system, there is no thirteenth floor. The floor numbers run to floor twelve and then the 'thirteenth floor' resumes count as floor 23. That's how he vainly markets a 70 story tower as "80 stories". By this rubric you all did get your '20 story tower'-provided that Paladino is willing to play along.

  41. doc

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 1st 2007, 11:35

    You don't think there are exclusive enclaves of the wealthy in other areas of the city, Skarnath? Every successful city has it's economically advantaged. I don't recall who mentioned a figure of 150,000.00 for a waterfront condo but that figure is laughable. You couldn't get a cardboard box for that price in other cities waterfront areas. Bring on the wealthy and all of their money. They're the ones who are going to fund the renaissance of Buffalo, not the politico's and not the developers (they spend most of their time at their gated communities in Florida). Money talks...don't ever forget it.

  42. MJWorthington

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 1st 2007, 12:25

    I agree with Ron R on the abatements. If you want people to take initial risks and develop property that will produce income down the road instead of not being there at all they are needed. If the market catches up in desirability subsequent ones may be able to suceed without the tax perks.

  43. tonyarmani

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 1st 2007, 16:18

    I think itd be funny if they built 3 towers, the one in the middle higher than the other 2, like a middle finger right at Canada! lol

  44. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 2nd 2007, 01:10

    Doc, there are people in East St. Louis who'll gladly sell you a 'cardboard box' on THEIR waterfront any 'ol time. Rats cost extra but if you steel enough copper from the streetlamp wires, dinner is served!

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links