Update- Grain Elevator Reuse in Sacramento

Update- Grain Elevator Reuse in Sacramento

Story Options

Grain elevator reuse is neither easy nor cheap. Take the recently-opened Globe Mills complex in Sacramento for instance. Last year we wrote up the Sacramento project as an example of what other cities are doing to preserve their industrial heritage. The project combines 114 senior housing units in a five-story building built on the mill property, 31 lofts in the historic mill buildings, and 5,000 sq.ft. of retail space. The silos have been incorporated as a signature element of the design.

GM2.jpg

GM3.jpg

The 93-year old Globe Mills complex is located on the edge of downtownSacramento in a predominantly industrial neighborhood. Abandoned since 1970, the property was nearly demolished as decay, vandalism and fires left the complex in shambles. Project architect Micheal F. Malinowski stumbled upon the Buffalo Rising story and recently sent along an update:

The Globe Mills project was a public/private partnership. I don’t think any community could afford to tackle abandoned industrial properties with all the costs and challenges they entail without a team effort. Neither the public sector alone, nor the private sector alone, can do such projects. When both work together, though, just about anything is possible, and projects like this can happen just about anywhere if the team has knowledgeable and experienced members on both sides of the table.

The ideal foundation of a public-private partnership is a clear understanding of partner objectives. By way of example, public objectives for the Globe site included revitalization of a blighted property, providing a jump-start to the economic transition of an industrial part of the city near the downtown to uses more appropriate given the central location, and spurring additional development in the neighborhood. It was also a public goal to create attractive, safe and comfortable housing for a mix of people from different age and economic backgrounds.

Residents add life to the streets, patronize surrounding nascent businesses oriented toward residents, and create a safer and more stable environment that encourages other projects to take hold.

The private sector objectives include creation of a project that would be financially viable, would be attractive and manageable, and that would make a positive contribution to the community in saving important historic resources. One unique characteristic of the Sacramento team’s developer is that they commit to long-term ownership and management of their properties.

The prime source of financing was federal affordable housing tax credits, which in every state of the union are used by the private sector, working closely with the public sector, to bring tax dollars to their local communities from Washington DC.

Other sources of funding included a brownfield grant from HUD, local tax increment and housing funds, and private equity including bank loans. On some similar projects I have worked on, such as the adaptive reuse of an abandoned hotel in downtown Stockton, historic tax credits have also played a role.

The project celebrated its grand opening October 1, and is already 75 percent occupied. The Globe Mills embraces many of the most desirable trends in urban development:

•Transit Oriented Development – located directly on a major light rail line •Energy Efficiency – the project exceeds energy conservation standards by at least 20 percent •Smart Growth – infill development with a density of over 150 units per acre •Historic Adaptive Reuse – conversion of historic silos and milling buildings into loft housing •Mixed Use – including affordable senior housing, market rate hip lofts, and commercial •Brownfield – cleaning up a formerly abandoned industrial site for a new life •Urban Infill Redevelopment – a major boost and catalyst to the neighborhood •Public/Private Partnership – bringing together the Redevelopment Agency, the State Tax Credit Allocation Committee and Federal Tax Credits, grants, loans, private equity, and private development resources in a leveraged public and private team effort.

Michael F. Malinowski AIA is President of Applied Architecture Inc., 916.456.2656

GM4.jpg Photos courtesy of Applied Architecture.

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. skarnath

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 09:15

    If we get our grain elevator district right, it will be at least as significant as the big 3 - Guaranty, Richardson Complex, & Martin House.

  2. PaulBuffalo

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 10:25

    I agree with skarnath's comments. The GLF grain elevator complex already has the appearance of a high-rise apartment complex, albeit a derelict one. There is potential with many of Buffalo's grain elevators, old churches and other edifices. Some reuse possibilities may take decades to achieve, but preservation and planning are important now.

  3. bboozehound

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 12:31

    Please, this is total nonsense! I mean aside from a couple quirky resuse designs out there these buildings are not worth saving and are on as prime land as there is in Buffalo. Coming up with a development master plan, creating a street grid, and clearing this land for new development should be a top priority. I get that people want to save the past and am all for it myself. Its just that we have to draw the line somewhere and be sensible. Other than a very small minority that views these structures as wildly significant they are just plain eyesores to the rest. Save everything - except these damn grain elevators! Do you hear one single complaint that the Hi Oats structure is no longer with us????

  4. RonR

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 12:49

    Skarnath-

    The "elevator district" idea was dead the moment the brilliant leaders of the city allowed an ethanol plant to go in one of the old grain elevators. Just another example of taking pennies now instead of looking at the big picture. Ask yourself, do the Guaranty, Richardson Complex, & Martin House have a fuel refinery located next door?

    This project in Sacramento is 3/4 a mile away from the State Capitol and even close to downtown Sacramento.

    I can see the value in creating an "elevator district" much like industrial conversions that find great success in other parts of the country. However, in typical Buffalo fashion, the opportunity was missed to add just a handful of blue collar jobs.

    Buffalo MUST let go of having an industrial waterfront. There simply is too much space in the region for the amount of possible opportunities to be consolidated and find success. The ethanol plant is going to kill conversion opportunities for a 1/4 mile radius, which is pretty much elevator alley.

    What I dream about is a Lackawanna and Buffalo merger. This would allow the old Bethlehem site to be the epicenter for industry on the lack for the region. It would allow the Buffalo river to be cleaned up for non industrial use and open the door for the Elevator district as you call it.

  5. Change

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 20:36

    First, one idea to reuse the grain elevators would be their incorporation into a mural or lighting project. It would seem to me that utilizing the vast empty spaces available would be an avenue to explore.

  6. royunderwood

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 22nd 2008, 22:03

    I agree with bboozehound. There are too many other preservation projects in Buffalo that are more value added than re-using the grain elevators. It's better to focus everyone's efforts on saving and re-using historic churches and buildings. I also would like to see a comprehensive plan for the re-emergence of downtown Buffalo, especially on both sides of Main Street, from the water down to Goodell St. We should spend the next 10-20 years making that street something to see!

  7. OnRichmond

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2008, 14:27

    And I agree with Change. Most see the grian elevators as derelict eyesores & detriments to development. Why can't a park be created around a some of them (Concrete Central and Cargills) and the elevators be treated with artistic lighting and the rail right of ways and bridges turned into trails? Couldn't a new park be a spur for development of the surrounding area?

    And by the way, aren't the Parthenon/Acropolis & the Coliseum old and decrepit!

  8. PaulBuffalo

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2008, 16:10

    I happen to be fond of ruins and I visited the Mesa Verde ruins in southwestern Colorado a few months ago. There, I met the author of 'American Ruins' (www.americanruinsbook.com), who photographs and documents ruins around the world. I photograph ruins, too, but the author here takes it to a heightened level. Check out the website. It offers a new perspective on how to perceive US history.

  9. skarnath

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2008, 17:34

    PaulBuffalo - thanks for the link. Great photos. Interesting that the traveling exhibition is currently at the Arkell Museum in Canajoharie - haflway between Utica & Albany.

    Fortunately, there are plenty of people in Buffalo who know the value of our grain elevators - not only as a major source of cultural tourism, but also as one of the most unique and powerful development opportunities in the country.

  10. Dan

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2008, 17:59

    I'd love to see some decent adaptive reuse for Buffalo's elevators, but as with St. Gerard ... how? Buffalo's elevators aren't downtown, but in the First Ward, in areas surrounded by heavy industry that are difficult to access. They're also HUGE, which means it'll take decades to absorb the demand for any new apartments, hotel rooms and so on that may be part of an adaptive reuse project ... that is, if the location was actually viable to begin with.

    Part of me says "keep them for the archaeologists of the future", despite their dereliction. Another part wants to see them torn down, as part of a massive project to remake the First Ward into a premier residential neighborhood.

    Buffalo seems to be cursed with great buildings in locations that make them terrible for redevelopment and adaptive reuse. :(

  11. AtwaterLouse

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2008, 21:06

    Dan, your last sentence is the all too common Buffalo-as-victim attitude. Buffalo isn't cursed by anything. Even if you could magically move those elevators anywhere in Erie Co, it wouldn't be financially sensible to convert them to anything, so it's beyond useless to whine about their location. Even the project WCP talks about in Sacramento, a much faster growing city, didn't really convert elevators into anything, did it? While he refers to it as "elevator reuse", it was other more normal buildings they converted - not the elevators themselves, right?

    Skarnath... Buffalo grain elevators as "one of the most unique and powerful development opportunities in the country"??? In the country? In the U.S.? Or did Buffalo just get traded to some country where that might be true? Then again, I can't even think of a country where that would be true. Seriously the unique part I can see but one of the most powerful opportunities? It's dreamy and creative and all that, but wouldn't using grain elevators for residential in Buffalo would have to rank as one of the least powerful development opportunities in the U.S.? Would you invest your own personal money in that?

  12. Biniszkiewicz

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2008, 00:02

    Grain elevators are tough to turn into living space, office space, any space involving people. They are cylindrical, which presents difficulties. It's not the easiest shape to use, plus most of the cylinders aren't terribly wide. The voids between the stacks are awkwardly shaped, difficult to use for much more than chases and closets. The walls are really, really thick; not easy to cut windows and doors into. There are a lot of interior spaces without opportunity for light. I'm skeptical we'll see any grain elevators converted to any people space locally any time soon. It's expensive and awkward.

    I don't know about other opportunities. I've heard of converting them to fish farms, but don't know if it was actually done. We've got that ethanol plant going in. I don't mind them as ruins. No need to knock them down. Maybe there will be some future use for them. Remember commodity price spikes last year? Traders were searching for grain elevators to use as. . . grain elevators. They might find some use someday and in the meantime they're built like the proverbial brick s...house; they're not going to fall down. Let them sit. Even vacant, they are a rich monument to our past and they don't hurt anyone.

  13. skarnath

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2008, 00:20

    Unique, powerful and...okay - difficult. And as Mr. Biniszkiewicz points out, the actual silos are very difficult to re-use. But there are a lot of incredible industrial buildings attached to and surrounding the elevator silos. And I believe there are a lot of talented architects who would love to take a swing at a variety of re-use ideas. Think San Antonio's Riverwalk on steroids, or cheerios...

  14. PaulBuffalo

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2008, 00:21

    Biniszkiewicz, the Quaker Square Inn in Akron, Ohio (www.quakersquareakron.com), seems to make use of grain elevator space just fine. From the photos I've seen over the years, I don't know if the appearance is an improvement, but it's a reuse nonetheless. My personal choice is to clean up the land around all of Buffalo's grain elevators, light up the elevators at night, get more access for people to enjoy the area, then include grain elevator tours in the architectural tourism list of attractions. At that point, maybe ideas regarding reuse will arise.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Members Who Bookmarked

Text Links